visit
Accessibility is about realizing that crypto needs normal people to have extremely easy entry points into the crypto economy.
Crypto’s most successful Cryptomobile will offer everyone easy ways for earning crypto, not just spending crypto.
To join the “Cult of Crypto” today, one must climb steep learning curves, gain experience, and demonstrate technical know-how in intellectual duels. Even when you follow all initiation rites, you’ll never summit the peak of crypto. Here’s writing to announce the .
Demanding the “highest levels of technical capability” means setting crypto admission standards that are a priori unattainable for all but a select few insiders.
Complexity only benefits those who have resources to control and understand complex processes.When it comes to global scaling, complexity and inaccessibility are not virtues.In automotive terms, today’s Cryptomobile is an over-built rig that claims to be , zombie-proof, Wall Street-proof, government-proof, trust-proof, and every other kind of -proof.
Crypto’s image of itself. Go anywhere; do anything. Unstoppable. Like the EarthRoamer. Photo credit: In reality, today’s Cryptomobile is structurally complex, pretentious (“smart contract”), expensive, inherently unscalable, and eats a ton of gas.
By , Crypto didn’t insulate itself from a world of exaggerated threats. It just made bad guys and about what’s happening under all that tint.Today’s situation is tragic because it was . The only “proofing” crypto ever needed to do, from the Bitcoin Whitepaper onwards, was to “fool-proof” all systems and processes. Instead of pretending to be “smart contract” CryptoLawyers, . It’s not too late to change; but the window of opportunity is .
Everyone should see how a Cryptomobile that’s chugging along, running out of gas, and constantly getting broken in to (and ) is a big problem.
Today, many developers are working hard to sell cleaner and leaner Cryptomobiles to the public.But thus far, crypto doesn’t have a runaway “proletarian” bestseller Crypto Model T, Crypto Camry, or Crypto Civic.
Instead, Crypto is still very much fixated on “Lambos.”
Lambos and EarthRomers are cool, but the solutions to Crypto’s global scaling and problems are crypto use cases that appeal to the maximum number of people.
To qualify as a hyperutility crypto app, a use case must satisfy three simple criteria:
Crypto needs adoption by the world’s billions.
Here’s the fastest roadmap to get there. (Hint: it’s an actual map; as in, a .)
Studebaker limousine. Source: Wikipedia.
Ford Model T. Source: Wikipedia.
Furthermore, we understand pushback from many crypto “collectors” who claim to be “investing” in, and “collecting/HODL-ing,” coins that they think represent a diverse portfolio of Studebakers and Fords, among others.
But in our view, today’s crypto has a lot of Studebakers and not a single Ford.If you disagree, if you think crypto has its Ford, tell us what that Ford is in a response below. Please understand:
Crypto can continue doing what it’s doing and maintain its “healthy growth,” just like Twitter maintains a “healthy network” by not rushing to fix what it thinks “ain’t broken.”
Indeed, the market for custom coach-builders and expert mechanics survived the Great Depression, World War I & II, and, most recently, the Great Recession. These service providers continue to do well today.But, be honest, when’s the last time you’ve seen a Studebaker on the road?Exactly.
Alternatively, crypto can realize that, despite its exponential adoption curves, global adoption can and should be much faster.
Most crypto analysts will concede that a big obstacle to much faster adoption is the lack of a shared interoperability vision, let alone anything resembling comprehensive inter-crypto interoperability standards.
There are many technical reasons why crypto lacks interoperability protocols. . Crypto is a very competitive space. Everyone wants to exploit what they think is their first-mover advantage.Before the game even starts, everyone thinks they will win because they have full control over their Cryptomobile. They can select different skins, like this , to make one’s Lamborghini Aventador a lot more “stealthy.”Today’s inter-crypto gamesmanship is like watching a group of friends facing off in a fierce game of Grand Theft Auto.
Because you can make virtually infinite numbers of mods to your rig, weapons, and scripts, it’s easy to start believing that you have written the rules that govern your race platform.
At the end of the day, you may have won some battles against your friends. But the people winning the war are the publishers of Grand Theft Auto.The key lesson from this exercise is that Crypto’s biggest competitors are not fellow crypto teams; . . Crypto’s inability to see this represents one of crypto’s biggest missed opportunities to date.
See the planes on the runway right behind those cars?When it comes to speed in getting people or things from point A to point B, the people who build and pilot those planes look at #27 and think, “awwwww, how cute.”
The inter-crypto race for primacy is only normal, but crypto adoption-drivers shouldn’t just look above steering wheels and “under the hood” to figure out how to go much faster.Very often, the breakthroughs that give orders of magnitude higher performance are whizzing about on totally different runways.
The only way to see them is by suspending assumptions and broadening your field of view.
Instead of trying to squeeze as much transactional horsepower out of one second as possible, crypto developers may be better served by rethinking the essence and structure of a transaction altogether. Here’s an for crypto. There are .
Bitcoin is the “Unix of money.” Ethereum is the “Linux of crypto.” IOTA is the “ of the machine economy.” And so on.
This approach gives development teams much needed respite from torrents of individual consumer demands for greater transaction speeds, overall utility, more security, etc. But this approach also has the disadvantage of creating a buffer between the developers of crypto operating systems and the end-users of those operating systems.
Crypto should stop getting high on its own supply; instead, crypto needs to understand what non-crypto people need from crypto.
Today’s biggest need area are easy-to-use applications that plug normal people into the crypto economy. All crypto developers benefit from successful end-user applications like this. All crypto development teams have a shared responsibility for incubating end-user applications like this.
In 2015, we started doing legal mechanics for several crypto projects, and started educating ourselves on the rapidly growing range of crypto projects, platforms, and possibilities.When we started seeing more and more bells and whistles, and so much chrome, and so many Lambos and Maybachs outside, we began to wonder — Could blockchain be the key for a CleanApp? Vice versa, was CleanApp the that crypto was desperately searching for?
Maybach Exelero. Predictably, our answer to both questions was “Yes” — . It yields noticeable material improvement, everyone’s better off, etc. etc. etc.
But that’s just context. We’re not plugging anything. This isn’t a sales pitch. It’s analysis. This part of the story is just better told by sharing our own experiences with crypto platform shopping.And so we started looking. Should we start sucking ? Should we get en--d? Should we seek ? Or go towards ?
One of the things we noticed early on in our research was that all end-user oriented crypto platforms lacked a basic feature — the ability to easily earn crypto by doing socially-useful work.
To us, the need for this “feature” is as obvious as the need for a seat belt in a car.
As a form of micro-finance, crypto is an ideal vehicle for incentivizing the production of socially-useful material service ( etc.), tracking the inputs, , and reaping the value of global I/O analytics on these underlying processes.
Despite the obvious value and utility of an app like that, there wasn’t and isn’t a crypto platform that makes development of globally-scalable apps like this easy.Ethereum comes close, but, among other problems, Ethereum’s transaction volume/bandwidth limitations mean that near-real-time rewards corresponding to real-time inputs would be all but impossible at billion-user scales (billions of daily transactions). IOTA seems like a possible fit, and we’re amidst that learning curve at present.
So, upon examining the Studebakers and Packards, and noticing that they’re missing seat belts, we did what you’d expect reasonable people to do: we asked the developers for seat belts.
Crypto’s response? If you want seat belts, build your own damn car!
There’s no need to reinvent the wheel.But the only way to free developers to specialize is to assure they will have meaningful choice between the crypto platform Studebakers and crypto platform Fords.
1920 Studebaker “Big-Six” Touring Car: $2350
1920 Ford Model T: $575
By 1924, Ford had sold its 10,000,000-th car (for comparison, the U.S. population in 1924 was 114,000,000).
The Model T kept getting cheaper ($575 in 1920 v. $295 in 1924), with objective improvements in quality in every product cycle.What was the key to this impressive and unprecedented growth? Answer: the automobile offered .
The Model T’s key selling point wasn’t “economical” service in the sense of just cheap do-it-yourself maintenance.
An explicit Ford selling point was that buying a Model T increased the buyer’s earnings.
Please note: it wasn’t just “the automobile” that made individuals’ lives more efficient, and made sweeping broader economic efficiency gains possible. It was the barrier-smashing Ford Model T that did that.
The Model T sold a healthier, more productive, less-stressful, more efficient, and more bountiful future.
Crypto’s lesson from the car industry in this respect is a contrastive one: what not to do.
From early lobbying efforts to dismantle public transportation networks to exploding Ford Pintos to the most recent Volkswagen emissions scandal, the car industry has carved some gnarly skid marks in ethical norms like transparency and commercial good faith.
Crypto needs to acknowledge that yes, the Model T killed people. Yes, the Model T ushered in the petrol age, the consequences of which now pose a threat to humanity’s very existence. Yes, the Model T introduced supply-chain and factory-line production methods that were appropriated by warriors to make ghastly mass-killing machines.
But the lesson isn’t to stop making knives. The key takeaway from recalling the car industry’s dark sides is to heighten the need for transparency and to be open with drivers regarding the risks of motoring.
Hyperutility apps may find it cheaper to externalize costs of production onto others. But as one learns in Economics 101, these costs aren’t ever fully externalized. Ever.Instead of hiding crypto risks and costs, crypto should be open about its risks and costs. This is the smartest way to minimize systemic risks and costs.
One of the key premises at the start of the analysis is this: there won’t be a tomorrow’s crypto worth speaking about until and unless crypto becomes accessible for novices.
This means giving rookies secure and easy pathways for earning crypto, as opposed to just inventing progressively easier ways to buy crypto.
The crypto developers who build secure and hyper-useful apps for earning crypto will write the rules of the 21st century economy.
[More analysis freely available ]