visit
This is not financial advice - it’s merely an opinion on the paradigm shift on cryptocurrency as a whole. Please consult with your financial advisor before you make any financial decision.
Cryptocurrency has had its own interesting and, sometimes controversial, relationship with the online world. The original intention was noble and daring - however, as with anything new, it has to go through a number of growing pains before it blossoms into its final application.
Oftentimes, many don’t even know how cryptocurrency works before using (or, usually, investing in) it. Crypto brought a lot of interesting, useful tech to light in recent years. While this tech did exist before, what this industry did was bring it together into a coherent application - the beginning of web3.
The evolution, inception, and very concept of crypto is interesting to say the least. In 2009, the Bitcoin whitepaper stated the original intention of the blockchain, and subsequently the “currency” that came along with it:
“A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution.”
What does this mean, exactly? This means instead of placing the trust with a third-party entity or perso; thee trust is merely placed within the technology itself - a sort of built-in trust. The consensus algorithm, or how Bitcoin decides what transaction is legit or not, represents this innate trust.
However, as we’ve seen over time, with a few cycles of boom and bust, the attitude towards crypto needs to change in a very profound way. Many hardcore supporters of Bitcoin speculate that Bitcoin is the solution to all the economic woes in the world. They advocate buying it and holding it forever. Instead, cryptocurrencies should be treated like an asset.
As time went on, new blockchains were created. These new chains held the same concept as Bitcoin in terms of peer-to-peer interactions; however, they deviated in terms of utility. The so-called “currency” of each chain, like Ethereum, merely became a temporary vehicle of value for smart contracts. Later on, this would go on to drive the creation of many other derivative currencies, each with its own respective qualities and attributes.
This, along with how people treat and speculate on these “currencies” actually behaves just like an asset or stock. Therefore, I’ll go out on a limb here and say we should start calling them crypto assets rather than cryptocurrencies.
“An asset is a resource with economic value that an individual, corporation, or country owns or controls with the expectation that it will provide a future benefit.”
"Bitcoin and the S&P 500 moved in sync, with their correlation rising to an all-time high of 0.69. This bred in the usefulness of crypto assets in portfolio diversification."
Here we can see a correlation between the S&P 500 and Bitcoin from TradingView.
The future looks very interesting for web3. With the fall of these currencies, we will see more practical applications with ledger technology take place. The recognition of crypto, along with other forms of digital assets and ownership, will pave the way for web3’s full and eventual adoption.
The metaverse concept will become more prominent, along with the normality of using cryptography for the basis for identity, along with digital ownership of assets. **