When you think of Meta (META), you might think of Facebook, Instagram, or, shudder, the metaverse. But the social media company has quickly become an artificial intelligence darling up there with the likes of OpenAI, Microsoft (MSFT), and Google (GOOG, GOOGL) · Meta’s AI success comes via ...

How Meta has become an AI behemoth

(Bloomberg) -- Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc. debuted a new artificial intelligence tool that can generate or edit videos based on a simple text prompt, elevating competition with rivals like OpenAI and Google in the race to develop the world’s most advanced AI technology.Most Read from ...

Meta Unveils AI Video Generator, Taking On OpenAI and Google

A pair of Harvard students successfully rigged Meta-formerly-Facebook and Ray Ban's smart glasses with facial recognition software.

Terrifying Smart Glasses Hack Can Pull Up Personal Info of Nearby Strangers in Seconds

Subscribe to our daily newsletter to keep in touch with the subjects shaping our future.

Facebook Is Being Flooded With Gross AI-Generated Images of Hurricane Helene Devastation

Science/AAAS peer-reviewed journals deliver impactful research, daily news, expert commentary, and career resources.

A study found Facebook’s algorithm didn’t promote political polarization. Critics have doubts

Meta is looking to revamp Facebook&#x27;s image as a place for younger Gen. Z users.

Meta seeks to revitalize Facebook's image among Gen Z with new product push

Facebook Marketplace has not only become a trusted source for LA’s second-hand scene. It’s made itself a real contender to go toe-to-toe with well-established e-commerce sites. Facebook has grown to 3.07 billion monthly active users (MAUs) as of the end of 2023, a 3% year-over-year increase.

Mark Zuckerberg is quietly sitting on a shopping empire with 4 times the customers of Amazon, as Facebook Marketplace skyrockets

37 Facebook, 13 pages, 5 groups, and 9 Instagram accounts were created and were violating Meta’s policies. Fictitious activist movement &quot;Operation K&quot; advocating pro-Sikh protests, notably in New Zealand and Australia. Network tried to influence news, current events by potentially using ...

Meta blocked Chinese fake accounts on Facebook, Instagram, fueling Khalistani extremism in India - The Economic Times Video | ET Now

Facebook (Meta)

facebook

In recent weeks, webmasters have raised urgent concerns regarding Facebook's aggressive crawling practices, particularly highlighting the behavior of its user agent, “facebookexternalhit.” Many site owners report that these bots are creating significant strain on their web hosting servers, leading to alarming spikes in traffic that threaten site reliability. Several site owners have come forward with their experiences, describing the overwhelming impact of Facebook’s crawling activities on their websites. One webmaster recounted their situation, said, “Our website gets hammered every 45 to 60 minutes with spikes of approximately 400 requests per second from 20 to 30 different IP addresses within Facebook’s netblocks. Between these spikes, the traffic is manageable, but the sudden load is risky.” This sentiment resonates with many, as webmasters are advocating for a more balanced distribution of requests from Facebook’s bots, akin to the behavior exhibited by Googlebot and other reputable search engine crawlers. The consequences of these excessive requests extend beyond mere inconvenience; they disrupt the user experience and lead to costly resource consumption for site owners. Smaller websites, in particular, have found themselves severely impacted. In response to the relentless onslaught, some webmasters have taken proactive measures by implementing stricter rules in their robots.txt files to shield their servers from the overwhelming traffic. However, because Facebook’s bot functions as a scraper rather than a traditional crawler, it disregards these instructions, further complicating the situation. This growing issue has sparked widespread discussions within the web development community, with experts urging Facebook to reconsider its crawling strategies. The collective voice of these webmasters underscores a critical need for a more sustainable approach to web scraping and crawling practices. In a bid to manage the excessive requests, many webmasters are turning to tools like Cloudflare, which provides robust features for managing traffic and implementing rate limiting. By configuring a rate-limiting WAF rule, webmasters can effectively throttle the number of requests originating from Facebook’s bots, alleviating server strain during peak traffic periods. One webmaster expressed their perspective on the necessity of a balanced approach, stating, “I don’t want to block the bot entirely, but the current pattern is unsustainable. Using Cloudflare’s rate limiting has allowed us to protect our site while still enabling Facebook to access our content for link previews.” Concerns regarding Facebook’s crawling practices have been echoed on various platforms. In a post on Cloudflare, one user articulated their frustrations: “I am writing to express my concern about the excessive crawling activity of Facebook’s crawler. “This excessive crawling is causing significant performance issues and potential downtime for our website.” They went on to detail, “Our web server logs indicate that Facebook’s crawler (facebookexternalhit/1.1 – 2a03:2880:22ff:7::face is making multiple requests to our WordPress website every second, even during off-peak hours,” “During peak hours, the crawler’s activity spikes to tens of thousands of requests per minute. This excessive crawling is overwhelming our servers and causing them to slow down or even crash.” While webmasters recognize the necessity of Facebook’s crawler for indexing purposes and making their content accessible to users, they firmly believe that the current level of crawling is excessive and unreasonable. As a result, many remain vigilant, closely monitoring their server performance and adjusting settings to mitigate the challenges posed by Facebook’s bots. The unfolding situation highlights a critical juncture for the web development community, with potential implications for how major tech companies manage web scraping and crawling practices in the future. As webmasters advocate for a more equitable solution, the outcome of this discussion could set important precedents in the industry, influencing the relationship between webmasters and tech giants moving forward. In recent weeks, webmasters have raised urgent concerns regarding Facebook's aggressive crawling practices , particularly highlighting the behavior of its user agent, “facebookexternalhit.” Many site owners report that these bots are creating significant strain on their web hosting servers, leading to alarming spikes in traffic that threaten site reliability. Facebook's aggressive crawling practices Several site owners have come forward with their experiences, describing the overwhelming impact of Facebook’s crawling activities on their websites. Several site owners have come forward with their experiences, describing the overwhelming impact of Facebook’s crawling activities on their websites. One webmaster recounted their situation, said, “Our website gets hammered every 45 to 60 minutes with spikes of approximately 400 requests per second from 20 to 30 different IP addresses within Facebook’s netblocks. Between these spikes, the traffic is manageable, but the sudden load is risky.” This sentiment resonates with many, as webmasters are advocating for a more balanced distribution of requests from Facebook’s bots , akin to the behavior exhibited by Googlebot and other reputable search engine crawlers. Facebook’s bots The consequences of these excessive requests extend beyond mere inconvenience; they disrupt the user experience and lead to costly resource consumption for site owners. Smaller websites, in particular, have found themselves severely impacted. In response to the relentless onslaught, some webmasters have taken proactive measures by implementing stricter rules in their robots.txt files to shield their servers from the overwhelming traffic. However, because Facebook’s bot functions as a scraper rather than a traditional crawler, it disregards these instructions, further complicating the situation. This growing issue has sparked widespread discussions within the web development community, with experts urging Facebook to reconsider its crawling strategies. The collective voice of these webmasters underscores a critical need for a more sustainable approach to web scraping and crawling practices. In a bid to manage the excessive requests, many webmasters are turning to tools like Cloudflare, which provides robust features for managing traffic and implementing rate limiting. By configuring a rate-limiting WAF rule, webmasters can effectively throttle the number of requests originating from Facebook’s bots, alleviating server strain during peak traffic periods. One webmaster expressed their perspective on the necessity of a balanced approach, stating, “I don’t want to block the bot entirely, but the current pattern is unsustainable. Using Cloudflare’s rate limiting has allowed us to protect our site while still enabling Facebook to access our content for link previews.” Concerns regarding Facebook’s crawling practices have been echoed on various platforms. In a post on Cloudflare, one user articulated their frustrations: “I am writing to express my concern about the excessive crawling activity of Facebook’s crawler. “This excessive crawling is causing significant performance issues and potential downtime for our website.” They went on to detail, “Our web server logs indicate that Facebook’s crawler (facebookexternalhit/1.1 – 2a03:2880:22ff:7::face is making multiple requests to our WordPress website every second, even during off-peak hours,” “During peak hours, the crawler’s activity spikes to tens of thousands of requests per minute. This excessive crawling is overwhelming our servers and causing them to slow down or even crash.” While webmasters recognize the necessity of Facebook’s crawler for indexing purposes and making their content accessible to users, they firmly believe that the current level of crawling is excessive and unreasonable. As a result, many remain vigilant, closely monitoring their server performance and adjusting settings to mitigate the challenges posed by Facebook’s bots. The unfolding situation highlights a critical juncture for the web development community, with potential implications for how major tech companies manage web scraping and crawling practices in the future. As webmasters advocate for a more equitable solution, the outcome of this discussion could set important precedents in the industry, influencing the relationship between webmasters and tech giants moving forward.

FaceBook Bots, Crawlers And User Agents Causing Resource Drains On Websites And Hosting Accounts

Facebook. Where do I even begin with this colossal junkyard of a platform? It's like someone took the concept of social networking and doused it in a vat of incompetence. Let's talk about how Facebook has managed to mess up beyond all common sense. Firstly, their idea of content moderation seems to be more about randomly throwing darts at a board than actually using any sort of coherent logic. Legitimate posts in perfectly innocuous groups are being whisked away into the digital ether while spam proliferates like a disease. Seriously, how does a post about genuine advice or a thoughtful discussion get flagged and removed, but the umpteenth spammy post for shady sunglasses or miracle weight loss pills in totally irrelevant groups get a free pass? It's like Facebook has an algorithm that's not just broken but actively malicious. Facebook cares more about profit margins than the user experience. Instead of fostering a community where people can share meaningful ideas and connect on a genuine level, they've turned it into a virtual junkyard where the loudest, most obnoxious, spammy advertisers and paid-to-post parasites reign supreme. What happened to valuing quality over quantity? Now, it's all about how many eyeballs they can shove in front of spammy URL posts or advertisements, regardless of whether those eyeballs are seeing something worthwhile or utter garbage. It's a race to the bottom where meaningful content is drowned out by an endless barrage of clickbait. And let's not forget the privacy nightmares. Facebook has more tentacles in your personal life than an overbearing mother-in-law. They track your every move, every click, every like, and probably your wet dreams if they could. Remember when Facebook was caught red-handed with plans to sell user data and received support from Facebook’s most senior executives, including CEO Mark Zuckerberg and chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg? Yeah, that happened, and somehow, we're all still here, feeding the beast with our personal information. According to approximately 4,000 pages of leaked internal documents obtained by NBC News, Zuckerberg allegedly supervised strategies aimed at centralizing the social network's influence and stifling competitors by using user data as leverage. This occurred despite public assurances from the company about protecting user data. The documents primarily cover the years 2011 to 2015. Facebook’s (Meta) latest spam joke Case in point: I joined a Facebook group dedicated to blogging and guest posting. Perfect, right? Wrong. I posted a meticulously crafted message with a URL, offering insightful tips on how to craft a perfect guest post. What did Facebook do? They promptly removed my post, citing some obscure community guideline violation. Meanwhile, the same group was inundated with spam posts about irrelevant topics, worthless websites, and other scammers, hawked by individuals paid to spread digital garbage like confetti at a clown convention. Facebook has lost its way. Digital Nonsense It's crystal clear that Facebook has lost its way. They seem more interested in padding their profits than ensuring a quality user experience. Maybe they're scrimping on competent programmers because their algorithms can't tell the difference between genuine content and spammy trash. There are better options out there, folks. Platforms that actually give a damn about quality and fairness. They know how to handle spam: swiftly and decisively, with bans and suspensions flying like justice from a vigilant sheriff. Meanwhile, Facebook twiddles its thumbs, letting the spammers run amok like unruly toddlers in a toy store. It's time for a change It's time for a change. Governments should consider banning this digital travesty of a platform. We deserve better. We deserve platforms that respect our time, our data, and our intelligence. Facebook had its chance. It's time to let it fade into irrelevance, like the distant memory of a regrettable haircut or Myspace. Facebook could have been a force for good - Instead, it’s a spam-loving machine The saddest part is that Facebook could have been a force for good. It could have been a platform where people from all walks of life could come together, share ideas, and foster genuine connections. Instead, it's a bloated, soulless husk of what it could have been—a place where spam rules and meaningful interaction is a rare gem buried under layers of digital detritus. Facebook is a joke Facebook is a joke—a sad, outdated relic in the age of superior social media alternatives. Let's move on, shall we? There's a whole world of digital connectivity out there, waiting for us to embrace platforms that actually value what matters. Facebook's love affair with scammers Facebook's love affair with scammers is a textbook example of corporate greed overshadowing ethical responsibility. They don't just turn a blind eye to scammers; they roll out the red carpet for them. It's like they have a special VIP section reserved for shady operators peddling everything from fake diplomas, get-rich-quick schemes, dodgy products and digital services. It's like they're saying, "Scam away, folks! Just make sure the ad revenue keeps flowing." They rake in cash hand over fist while unsuspecting users fall victim to schemes that would make even the most seasoned con artist blush. Facebook doesn't care. And the best part? Facebook doesn't care. They're too busy counting their ill-gotten gains to bother with pesky details like vetting advertisers or ensuring the legitimacy of promoted services. Who cares if someone's promoting a Ponzi scheme or selling snake oil disguised as miracle cures? Certainly not Facebook, as long as those sweet advertising dollars keep pouring in. Facebook's revenue - Willful ignorance Let's face it: a substantial chunk of Facebook's revenue likely comes from scammers. I mean, do they even bother to check? The obvious answer is no. It's the digital equivalent of renting out billboard space to a carnival barker without asking what's under the tent. They're complicit, whether through negligence or willful ignorance. So, while the rest of us navigate the internet with caution, Facebook gleefully lines its pockets with ad click money earned from the misfortune of others. It's a disgrace, a betrayal of trust, and a stark reminder that when it comes to ethics, Facebook is MIA. Facebook's laissez-faire attitude towards scammy and spammy advertisers is not just irresponsible—it's reprehensible. They owe their users better. They owe the digital community better. It’s time our governments finally put a stop to this mayhem. Hence why I have decided to start my own movement, a reporting agency that finds, responds to and reports every scam we come across. Then, provide a database every month to my national government that reflects the reported scams Meta refuses to remove after being reported. A visionary will emerge - Sooner than you think! Someday, a visionary will emerge—someone smarter, bolder, and more ethical than Zuckerberg and his cohort of profit-driven enablers. This visionary will revolutionize social media, leaving Facebook (or Meta, as they now call it) in the dust. (Watch this space) Picture this: a platform where authenticity reigns supreme. Only real people, genuine advertisers, and vetted content are allowed. No more scams, no more clickbait, no more shady dealings. It's a place where integrity is not just a buzzword but a guiding principle. This new social media titan will prioritize user safety and privacy above all else. Children will be protected, personal data will be guarded like a treasure, and transparency will be the cornerstone of every interaction. Imagine a digital space where users can connect, share, and thrive without fear of exploitation or deception. And yes, this platform will make money. But unlike Facebook, its success won't come at the expense of its users' trust. It will be a fair exchange where value is delivered without compromising principles. Advertising will be relevant and respectful, enhancing the user experience rather than detracting from it.  It’s coming, believe me. Maybe sooner than you think. Meta, beware. The winds of change are blowing, and it's only a matter of time until you become the next Myspace—a relic of a bygone era. The future belongs to those who innovate with integrity and prioritize the well-being of their community. So, brace yourself because the revolution is coming, and when it arrives, the world will finally have a social media platform worthy of its users. So, Facebook, if you're listening (which you probably are because, let's face it, you're always listening), get your act together. Clean up your act. Start valuing quality content and user experience over your bottom line driven by spam and scams. Stop treating us like commodities to be sold to the highest bidder. Until then, I'll be over here, trying to salvage what's left of my faith in social media. And maybe, just maybe, hoping for a platform that actually gives a damn about its legitimate users instead of spammers and scammers. It's time they cleaned up their act and started prioritizing integrity over profit, and governments start handing out major penalties Until then, caveat emptor: let the buyer beware, especially when it comes to anything Facebook promotes on its junkyard of depict, spam and filth. Facebook. Where do I even begin with this colossal junkyard of a platform? It's like someone took the concept of social networking and doused it in a vat of incompetence. Let's talk about how Facebook has managed to mess up beyond all common sense. Firstly, their idea of content moderation seems to be more about randomly throwing darts at a board than actually using any sort of coherent logic. Legitimate posts in perfectly innocuous groups are being whisked away into the digital ether while spam proliferates like a disease. Seriously, how does a post about genuine advice or a thoughtful discussion get flagged and removed, but the umpteenth spammy post for shady sunglasses or miracle weight loss pills in totally irrelevant groups get a free pass? It's like Facebook has an algorithm that's not just broken but actively malicious. Facebook cares more about profit margins than the user experience. Instead of fostering a community where people can share meaningful ideas and connect on a genuine level, they've turned it into a virtual junkyard where the loudest, most obnoxious, spammy advertisers and paid-to-post parasites reign supreme. What happened to valuing quality over quantity? Now, it's all about how many eyeballs they can shove in front of spammy URL posts or advertisements, regardless of whether those eyeballs are seeing something worthwhile or utter garbage. It's a race to the bottom where meaningful content is drowned out by an endless barrage of clickbait. And let's not forget the privacy nightmares. Facebook has more tentacles in your personal life than an overbearing mother-in-law. They track your every move, every click, every like, and probably your wet dreams if they could. Remember when Facebook was caught red-handed with plans to sell user data and received support from Facebook’s most senior executives, including CEO Mark Zuckerberg and chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg? Yeah, that happened, and somehow, we're all still here, feeding the beast with our personal information. plans to sell user data According to approximately 4,000 pages of leaked internal documents obtained by NBC News, Zuckerberg allegedly supervised strategies aimed at centralizing the social network's influence and stifling competitors by using user data as leverage. This occurred despite public assurances from the company about protecting user data. The documents primarily cover the years 2011 to 2015. Facebook’s (Meta) latest spam joke Case in point: I joined a Facebook group dedicated to blogging and guest posting. Perfect, right? Wrong. I posted a meticulously crafted message with a URL, offering insightful tips on how to craft a perfect guest post . guest post What did Facebook do? What did Facebook do? They promptly removed my post, citing some obscure community guideline violation. Meanwhile, the same group was inundated with spam posts about irrelevant topics, worthless websites, and other scammers , hawked by individuals paid to spread digital garbage like confetti at a clown convention. spam posts other scammers Facebook has lost its way. Digital Nonsense It's crystal clear that Facebook has lost its way. They seem more interested in padding their profits than ensuring a quality user experience. Maybe they're scrimping on competent programmers because their algorithms can't tell the difference between genuine content and spammy trash. There are better options out there, folks. Platforms that actually give a damn about quality and fairness. They know how to handle spam: swiftly and decisively, with bans and suspensions flying like justice from a vigilant sheriff. Meanwhile, Facebook twiddles its thumbs, letting the spammers run amok like unruly toddlers in a toy store. It's time for a change It's time for a change. Governments should consider banning this digital travesty of a platform. We deserve better. We deserve platforms that respect our time, our data, and our intelligence. Facebook had its chance. It's time to let it fade into irrelevance, like the distant memory of a regrettable haircut or Myspace. Facebook could have been a force for good - Instead, it’s a spam-loving machine Facebook could have been a force for good - Instead, it’s a spam-loving machine The saddest part is that Facebook could have been a force for good. It could have been a platform where people from all walks of life could come together, share ideas, and foster genuine connections. Instead, it's a bloated, soulless husk of what it could have been—a place where spam rules and meaningful interaction is a rare gem buried under layers of digital detritus. Facebook Facebook is a joke Facebook is a joke—a sad, outdated relic in the age of superior social media alternatives. Let's move on, shall we? There's a whole world of digital connectivity out there, waiting for us to embrace platforms that actually value what matters. Facebook's love affair with scammers Facebook's love affair with scammers is a textbook example of corporate greed overshadowing ethical responsibility. They don't just turn a blind eye to scammers; they roll out the red carpet for them. It's like they have a special VIP section reserved for shady operators peddling everything from fake diplomas, get-rich-quick schemes, dodgy products and digital services. love affair with scammers shady operators fake It's like they're saying, "Scam away, folks! Just make sure the ad revenue keeps flowing." They rake in cash hand over fist while unsuspecting users fall victim to schemes that would make even the most seasoned con artist blush. Facebook doesn't care. And the best part? Facebook doesn't care. They're too busy counting their ill-gotten gains to bother with pesky details like vetting advertisers or ensuring the legitimacy of promoted services. Who cares if someone's promoting a Ponzi scheme or selling snake oil disguised as miracle cures? Certainly not Facebook, as long as those sweet advertising dollars keep pouring in. Facebook's revenue - Willful ignorance Let's face it: a substantial chunk of Facebook's revenue likely comes from scammers. I mean, do they even bother to check? The obvious answer is no. It's the digital equivalent of renting out billboard space to a carnival barker without asking what's under the tent. They're complicit, whether through negligence or willful ignorance. So, while the rest of us navigate the internet with caution, Facebook gleefully lines its pockets with ad click money earned from the misfortune of others. It's a disgrace, a betrayal of trust, and a stark reminder that when it comes to ethics, Facebook is MIA. Facebook's laissez-faire attitude towards scammy and spammy advertisers is not just irresponsible—it's reprehensible. They owe their users better. They owe the digital community better. It’s time our governments finally put a stop to this mayhem. Hence why I have decided to start my own movement, a reporting agency that finds, responds to and reports every scam we come across. Then, provide a database every month to my national government that reflects the reported scams Meta refuses to remove after being reported. the reported scams A visionary will emerge - Sooner than you think! Someday, a visionary will emerge—someone smarter, bolder, and more ethical than Zuckerberg and his cohort of profit-driven enablers. This visionary will revolutionize social media, leaving Facebook (or Meta, as they now call it) in the dust. (Watch this space) Picture this: a platform where authenticity reigns supreme. Only real people, genuine advertisers, and vetted content are allowed. No more scams, no more clickbait, no more shady dealings. It's a place where integrity is not just a buzzword but a guiding principle. authenticity content This new social media titan will prioritize user safety and privacy above all else. Children will be protected, personal data will be guarded like a treasure, and transparency will be the cornerstone of every interaction. Imagine a digital space where users can connect, share, and thrive without fear of exploitation or deception. And yes, this platform will make money. But unlike Facebook, its success won't come at the expense of its users' trust. It will be a fair exchange where value is delivered without compromising principles. Advertising will be relevant and respectful, enhancing the user experience rather than detracting from it.  It’s coming, believe me. Maybe sooner than you think. Meta, beware. The winds of change are blowing, and it's only a matter of time until you become the next Myspace—a relic of a bygone era. The future belongs to those who innovate with integrity and prioritize the well-being of their community. So, brace yourself because the revolution is coming, and when it arrives, the world will finally have a social media platform worthy of its users. So, Facebook, if you're listening (which you probably are because, let's face it, you're always listening), get your act together. Clean up your act. Start valuing quality content and user experience over your bottom line driven by spam and scams. Stop treating us like commodities to be sold to the highest bidder. Until then, I'll be over here, trying to salvage what's left of my faith in social media. And maybe, just maybe, hoping for a platform that actually gives a damn about its legitimate users instead of spammers and scammers. It's time they cleaned up their act and started prioritizing integrity over profit, and governments start handing out major penalties Until then, caveat emptor: let the buyer beware, especially when it comes to anything Facebook promotes on its junkyard of depict, spam and filth.

Facebook Has Managed To Mess Up Beyond All Common Sense. A Social Media Nightmare 

My relationship with Facebook has reached its breaking point, and I can no longer ignore the glaring issues that have plagued us for far too long. It's time to part ways, once and for all. The platform and its big-shot owner have become a joke. I used to believe in the potential of our connection, in the promise of staying connected with friends and family across the globe. But that promise has been overshadowed by your relentless promotion of scams and misinformation. From bogus miracle cures to get-rich-quick schemes and marketplaces selling dodgy digital services, you've become a playground for con artists and scammers, preying on unsuspecting users with impunity. And let's not forget the danger you pose to children. Instead of providing a safe and nurturing environment for young minds to explore and learn, you've become a breeding ground for predators and bullies. Your lax moderation policies have allowed harmful content to flourish, leaving children vulnerable to exploitation and abuse. I can't continue to support a platform that puts profit above the safety and well-being of its users, especially its most vulnerable ones. It's clear that you've lost sight of your original purpose, becoming nothing more than a soulless machine driven by greed and indifference. The grievances I've aired so far barely scratch the surface of the multitude of issues that have tainted our relationship. It's time to address the elephant in the room: the rampant proliferation of fake profiles and the deafening silence that follows scam reports. I'm tired of scrolling through my friend requests only to be greeted by a slew of obviously fake accounts, each one more transparent in its deception than the last. It's absurd how many "Nigerian princes" and "Instagram models" I'm expected to believe are genuine. Yet, despite countless users reporting these obvious imposters, you seem content to turn a blind eye, allowing them to continue their charade unchecked. But what's even more infuriating is the utter futility of reporting scams and fraudulent activity on your platform. I've lost count of the number of times I've flagged suspicious posts or reported fraudulent advertisements only to receive automated responses or, worse yet, no response at all. It's as if my concerns fall on deaf ears, disappearing into the void without so much as a second thought. Your lackluster response to these glaring issues speaks volumes about your priorities. Instead of cracking down on fake profiles and scams, you seem more concerned with maximizing engagement and profits, regardless of the cost to your users. It's a betrayal of trust on the highest order, and I refuse to be complicit any longer. I'm done playing this game of cat and mouse, where you pretend to care about the safety and well-being of your users while turning a blind eye to the very real harm being inflicted. Deleting my account is the only logical course of action, a necessary step in reclaiming control over my digital life and distancing myself from your negligence and indifference. It's time to prioritize the safety and well-being of myself and others over your insatiable appetite for profit. I can no longer be a part of a platform that actively contributes to the erosion of trust and the spread of harm The Z Factor - A Pasty Face Joke Ugh, where do I even start with Zuckerberg? That guy embodies everything I can't stand. His smug face is plastered everywhere, acting like he's some kind of tech messiah, but all he does is ruin lives and invade privacy. Remember when Facebook started out as this fun little way to connect with friends? Mark Elliot Zuckerberg (born May 14, 1984), the relatively unknown and pale-faced tax avoider, owns a rather obscure media platform humorously dubbed "Arsebook" (using the British term). Should this platform ever gain popularity—highly unlikely, given its intent to collect vast amounts of personal data—Zuckerberg will certainly make his mark on history. People might even ponder his peculiar surname and eventually learn that in German, it translates to "sugar mountain." .Just hearing his name makes my blood boil. He acts like he's some kind of visionary genius, but all I see is a power-hungry, greedy opportunist. Facebook, or should I say Meta now? What a joke. It's like he can't even stick to one idea and perfect it. Instead, he’s always jumping on the next big thing to make more money, no matter the consequences. His obsession with controlling everything is infuriating. Look at how he’s bought up Instagram, WhatsApp, and who knows what else. It's like he wants to monopolize every aspect of our digital lives. And what about his so-called commitment to free speech? It’s laughable. He talks a big game about connecting people, but he’s created one of the most toxic environments on the internet. Facebook is a breeding ground for misinformation, hate speech, and divisiveness. Does he care? Of course not. As long as it drives engagement and keeps the ad dollars flowing, he's happy to let the chaos continue. And then there's his creepy obsession with virtual reality and the metaverse. It's like he's trying to trap us all in some dystopian nightmare where he controls everything. The way he tries to paint it as the future of human interaction is just laughable. It's clear he's only interested in furthering his own power and wealth, no matter the cost to society. Zuckerberg's arrogance is off the charts. He thinks he knows what's best for everyone and acts like he's above the law. His testimony in front of Congress was a joke – dodging questions, giving vague answers, and pretending to be clueless about Facebook's impact. It's infuriating how he gets away with it all. It's like watching a malfunctioning android. Mark Zuckerberg epitomizes everything wrong with Silicon Valley. He’s the poster boy for corporate greed, ethical bankruptcy, and the unchecked power of tech giants. I despise everything he stands for and the toxic impact he's had on our society. Goodbye, Facebook. You won't be missed. My relationship with Facebook has reached its breaking point, and I can no longer ignore the glaring issues that have plagued us for far too long. It's time to part ways, once and for all. The platform and its big-shot owner have become a joke. I used to believe in the potential of our connection, in the promise of staying connected with friends and family across the globe. But that promise has been overshadowed by your relentless promotion of scams and misinformation. From bogus miracle cures to get-rich-quick schemes and marketplaces selling dodgy digital services, you've become a playground for con artists and scammers, preying on unsuspecting users with impunity. And let's not forget the danger you pose to children. Instead of providing a safe and nurturing environment for young minds to explore and learn, you've become a breeding ground for predators and bullies. Your lax moderation policies have allowed harmful content to flourish, leaving children vulnerable to exploitation and abuse. I can't continue to support a platform that puts profit above the safety and well-being of its users, especially its most vulnerable ones. It's clear that you've lost sight of your original purpose, becoming nothing more than a soulless machine driven by greed and indifference. The grievances I've aired so far barely scratch the surface of the multitude of issues that have tainted our relationship. It's time to address the elephant in the room: the rampant proliferation of fake profiles and the deafening silence that follows scam reports. I'm tired of scrolling through my friend requests only to be greeted by a slew of obviously fake accounts, each one more transparent in its deception than the last. It's absurd how many "Nigerian princes" and "Instagram models" I'm expected to believe are genuine. Yet, despite countless users reporting these obvious imposters, you seem content to turn a blind eye, allowing them to continue their charade unchecked. But what's even more infuriating is the utter futility of reporting scams and fraudulent activity on your platform. I've lost count of the number of times I've flagged suspicious posts or reported fraudulent advertisements only to receive automated responses or, worse yet, no response at all. It's as if my concerns fall on deaf ears, disappearing into the void without so much as a second thought. Your lackluster response to these glaring issues speaks volumes about your priorities. Instead of cracking down on fake profiles and scams , you seem more concerned with maximizing engagement and profits, regardless of the cost to your users. It's a betrayal of trust on the highest order, and I refuse to be complicit any longer. fake profiles scams I'm done playing this game of cat and mouse, where you pretend to care about the safety and well-being of your users while turning a blind eye to the very real harm being inflicted. Deleting my account is the only logical course of action, a necessary step in reclaiming control over my digital life and distancing myself from your negligence and indifference. It's time to prioritize the safety and well-being of myself and others over your insatiable appetite for profit. I can no longer be a part of a platform that actively contributes to the erosion of trust and the spread of harm The Z Factor - A Pasty Face Joke Ugh, where do I even start with Zuckerberg? That guy embodies everything I can't stand. His smug face is plastered everywhere, acting like he's some kind of tech messiah, but all he does is ruin lives and invade privacy. Remember when Facebook started out as this fun little way to connect with friends? Mark Elliot Zuckerberg (born May 14, 1984), the relatively unknown and pale-faced tax avoider, owns a rather obscure media platform humorously dubbed "Arsebook" (using the British term). Should this platform ever gain popularity—highly unlikely, given its intent to collect vast amounts of personal data—Zuckerberg will certainly make his mark on history. People might even ponder his peculiar surname and eventually learn that in German, it translates to "sugar mountain." .Just hearing his name makes my blood boil. He acts like he's some kind of visionary genius, but all I see is a power-hungry, greedy opportunist. Facebook, or should I say Meta now? What a joke. It's like he can't even stick to one idea and perfect it. Instead, he’s always jumping on the next big thing to make more money, no matter the consequences. His obsession with controlling everything is infuriating. Look at how he’s bought up Instagram, WhatsApp, and who knows what else. It's like he wants to monopolize every aspect of our digital lives. And what about his so-called commitment to free speech? It’s laughable. He talks a big game about connecting people, but he’s created one of the most toxic environments on the internet. Facebook is a breeding ground for misinformation, hate speech, and divisiveness. Does he care? Of course not. As long as it drives engagement and keeps the ad dollars flowing, he's happy to let the chaos continue. And then there's his creepy obsession with virtual reality and the metaverse. It's like he's trying to trap us all in some dystopian nightmare where he controls everything. The way he tries to paint it as the future of human interaction is just laughable. It's clear he's only interested in furthering his own power and wealth, no matter the cost to society. Zuckerberg's arrogance is off the charts. He thinks he knows what's best for everyone and acts like he's above the law. His testimony in front of Congress was a joke – dodging questions, giving vague answers, and pretending to be clueless about Facebook's impact. It's infuriating how he gets away with it all. It's like watching a malfunctioning android. Mark Zuckerberg epitomizes everything wrong with Silicon Valley. He’s the poster boy for corporate greed, ethical bankruptcy, and the unchecked power of tech giants. I despise everything he stands for and the toxic impact he's had on our society. Goodbye, Facebook. You won't be missed.

Dear Facebook, I'm Breaking Up With You. 

Landing a position at tech giants like Google, Meta, and Amazon is not merely about prestige. These companies offer lucrative salaries, comprehensive benefits, and the chance to work on cutting-edge technologies alongside some of the brightest minds in the industry. Contrary to popular belief, a history of programming from a young age, Olympiad wins, or insider connections aren’t needed. The key lies in not just being seen, but in shining brightly. As someone who received offers from Amazon, Twitter, and Snapchat, I will share my insights on how to stand out without referrals and ace the notoriously difficult coding interviews. Strategies to Shine: Competitive Programming: Rank in the top 10% in ACM ICPC competitions or online coding platforms like CodeForces/CodeChef
Hackathons: Win collegiate hackathons or specific categories. My journey, for instance, was significantly boosted by a win at Princeton University's hackathon.
YouTube Channel: Establishing a tech-focused YouTube channel with a substantial following (50K+ subscribers) can set you apart.
Projects: Releasing apps on the Google/iOS store or GitHub that garner a lot of stars or downloads (10K+) can highlight your practical skills and innovation.
Community Impact: Initiatives that make a tangible difference in the tech community, such as founding a hackathon-focused student organization, can demonstrate your leadership and commitment to the tech ecosystem. You might be asking yourself are these activities resume fillers? If not why do they work? The reason why they work is because they are indicators of your technical acumen, domain expertise, and leadership potential. For example: success in competitive programming and hackathons signals your readiness for rigorous technical interviews. A successful tech-centric YouTube channel serves as a testament to your knowledge and ability to engage with a wide audience. Leading community initiatives showcases your potential as a thoughtful leader in the tech industry. Now that we know how to standout without referrals let’s understand the interview process at tech giants Behavioral Interview: This stage is about reflecting on your past experiences and articulating your achievements. It's crucial to talk about your contributions and quantify your accomplishments whenever possible.
Technical Interview: Beyond solving problems, it's important to identify patterns and verbalize your thought process. This demonstrates not just your technical proficiency but also your ability to communicate complex ideas.
System Design: Especially important for companies like Snapchat and Netflix, this stage tests your ability to design robust, scalable systems, reflecting a deep understanding of technical architectures. Getting Started for High School and University Students: If you're currently in high school or university, immerse yourself in competitive programming competitions like ACM ICPC and CodeForces. Participate in local or international hackathons, and if your university lacks such events, take the initiative to create a student organization dedicated to tech upskilling. Holding an officer position in such a group not only hones your skills but also prepares you for behavioral interviews by providing real-world scenarios to draw from. Lastly, securing a position in a major tech firm is a testament to your dedication, skill, and passion. While the journey is challenging, with each setback serving as a stepping stone to success, perseverance is key. Celebrate every milestone, learn from every setback, and keep striving towards your goal. Remember, rejection is a detour, not a dead end. It takes just one 'Yes' to eclipse the shadows of prior rejections. Landing a position at tech giants like Google, Meta, and Amazon is not merely about prestige. These companies offer lucrative salaries, comprehensive benefits, and the chance to work on cutting-edge technologies alongside some of the brightest minds in the industry. Contrary to popular belief, a history of programming from a young age, Olympiad wins, or insider connections aren’t needed. The key lies in not just being seen, but in shining brightly. As someone who received offers from Amazon, Twitter, and Snapchat, I will share my insights on how to stand out without referrals and ace the notoriously difficult coding interviews. Strategies to Shine: Strategies to Shine: Competitive Programming: Rank in the top 10% in ACM ICPC competitions or online coding platforms like CodeForces/CodeChef Hackathons: Win collegiate hackathons or specific categories. My journey, for instance, was significantly boosted by a win at Princeton University's hackathon. YouTube Channel: Establishing a tech-focused YouTube channel with a substantial following (50K+ subscribers) can set you apart. Projects: Releasing apps on the Google/iOS store or GitHub that garner a lot of stars or downloads (10K+) can highlight your practical skills and innovation. Community Impact: Initiatives that make a tangible difference in the tech community, such as founding a hackathon-focused student organization, can demonstrate your leadership and commitment to the tech ecosystem. Competitive Programming: Rank in the top 10% in ACM ICPC competitions or online coding platforms like CodeForces/CodeChef Hackathons: Win collegiate hackathons or specific categories. My journey, for instance, was significantly boosted by a win at Princeton University's hackathon. YouTube Channel: Establishing a tech-focused YouTube channel with a substantial following (50K+ subscribers) can set you apart. Projects: Releasing apps on the Google/iOS store or GitHub that garner a lot of stars or downloads (10K+) can highlight your practical skills and innovation. Community Impact: Initiatives that make a tangible difference in the tech community, such as founding a hackathon-focused student organization, can demonstrate your leadership and commitment to the tech ecosystem. You might be asking yourself are these activities resume fillers? If not why do they work? The reason why they work is because they are indicators of your technical acumen, domain expertise, and leadership potential. For example: success in competitive programming and hackathons signals your readiness for rigorous technical interviews. A successful tech-centric YouTube channel serves as a testament to your knowledge and ability to engage with a wide audience. Leading community initiatives showcases your potential as a thoughtful leader in the tech industry. Now that we know how to standout without referrals let’s understand the interview process at tech giants Behavioral Interview: This stage is about reflecting on your past experiences and articulating your achievements. It's crucial to talk about your contributions and quantify your accomplishments whenever possible. Technical Interview: Beyond solving problems, it's important to identify patterns and verbalize your thought process. This demonstrates not just your technical proficiency but also your ability to communicate complex ideas. System Design: Especially important for companies like Snapchat and Netflix, this stage tests your ability to design robust, scalable systems, reflecting a deep understanding of technical architectures. Behavioral Interview : This stage is about reflecting on your past experiences and articulating your achievements. It's crucial to talk about your contributions and quantify your accomplishments whenever possible. Behavioral Interview Technical Interview : Beyond solving problems, it's important to identify patterns and verbalize your thought process. This demonstrates not just your technical proficiency but also your ability to communicate complex ideas. Technical Interview System Design : Especially important for companies like Snapchat and Netflix, this stage tests your ability to design robust, scalable systems, reflecting a deep understanding of technical architectures. System Design Getting Started for High School and University Students: Getting Started for High School and University Students: If you're currently in high school or university, immerse yourself in competitive programming competitions like ACM ICPC and CodeForces. Participate in local or international hackathons, and if your university lacks such events, take the initiative to create a student organization dedicated to tech upskilling. Holding an officer position in such a group not only hones your skills but also prepares you for behavioral interviews by providing real-world scenarios to draw from. Lastly, securing a position in a major tech firm is a testament to your dedication, skill, and passion. While the journey is challenging, with each setback serving as a stepping stone to success, perseverance is key. Celebrate every milestone, learn from every setback, and keep striving towards your goal. Remember, rejection is a detour, not a dead end. It takes just one 'Yes' to eclipse the shadows of prior rejections.

Unlocking Doors to Google & Facebook!

298 Stories To Learn About Facebook

In the world of social media, we expect a certain level of safety and security. We trust platforms like Facebook to provide a space where we can connect with friends, share our lives, and engage with the online community. But what happens when the very platform that's meant to protect us ends up doing just the opposite? Just today, I found myself in a frustrating situation that left me baffled and infuriated. I encountered a on Facebook who was trying to pull off the typical SEO link-building scam, and I took it upon myself to report this individual for their deceptive behavior. scammer He was attempting to sell me a bunch of PBN links via a Facebook group. After checking them, I found they were all penalized domains on sites with no templates, no SSL certificates, full of spammy casino content & links, and not a single article indexed in the search engines. This parasite scammer, flogging these off as “Quality PBNs,” was well aware of what he was selling and that the PBN domains were dead. He was fully aware that he was attempting to pull off a link-building scam and knew the product was defective. Little did I know that this simple act of self-defense would result in Facebook suspending me for seven days while the scammer continued their illicit activities unhindered. Funny that this scummy parasite scam flogs called me dog and son of a bitch. Yet I got banned, and flea lives on. Let me be clear: reporting a scammer should be a no-brainer. It's something that should be encouraged and supported by all social media platforms, including Facebook. Users should feel empowered to speak out against those who are trying to deceive, manipulate, or harm them. So, imagine my shock when I found myself penalized for trying to protect myself and others from a scammer. Not only did I report the scam, but I also had some choice words for the scammer. I called him a "worthless scam beggar" and let them know that their attempts to deceive me were utterly futile. While I understand that maintaining a respectful tone in our online interactions is crucial, it's essential to recognize the intent behind my message. I was trying to protect myself and others from a potential threat. The larger issue here is . They need to invest in better moderation systems, clearer guidelines, and a more transparent reporting process to prevent innocent users from getting caught in the crossfire. Facebook's responsibility to ensure its users' safety It's not about promoting a culture of online negativity but rather about striking a balance between self-defense and community protection. Scammers and fraudsters are persistent, and it's up to social media platforms to keep up with their evolving tactics. The incident I experienced is just one example of the challenges these platforms face when handling scams and fraudulent activities effectively. Facebook, like all social media giants, should continually improve its reporting and enforcement systems to better protect its users and create a safer online environment for everyone. In the end, it's a reminder for all of us to stay vigilant and cautious in the digital world. Trust your instincts and report suspicious activity, but always be mindful of your tone when dealing with potential scammers. (Facebook will always Favour the scammer in this case - tired and proven countless times) Because of Facebook’s deplorable actions, I personally hope for a future where Facebook becomes a mere relic of the past, who can't afford their own internet connections, leeching off their neighbors' Wi-Fi. overrun by scammers It's a vision where a newer, fresher, and more socially acceptable platform takes over, one that genuinely cares about protecting its users from scams and fraudulent activities. Perhaps then, and I hope Facebook will become a digital wasteland, and they would more than deserve that fate, especially given their history with me. Let's hope that Facebook and other social media platforms learn from incidents like these so they can provide the safety and security their users deserve. In my own personal opinion. Facebook is a disgrace and a poor example of current-day social acceptance and online behavior. It protects scammers over potential victims. The platform makes me sick. Long live TikTok & LinkedIn (Where the real people go these days)

Facebook Fiasco: Banning the Victim, Not the Scammer"

In the labyrinth of the digital age, where fake profiles thrive and tarnish the online experience, we find ourselves in the confounding realm of . Facebook Here, we unveil a saga of deception, focusing on a character known as "Lucy Audrey" – a prime exemplar of the fake profile menace and the absurdity of Facebook's refusal to suspend such accounts. The Era of Fake Profiles & Scammers: Lucy Audrey Unveiled Meet "Lucy Audrey," a fictional persona operated by an individual from Faisalabad, Pakistan, who shamelessly touts digital marketing and search engine optimization services. The irony runs deep - an individual claiming expertise in an industry requiring skill and experience is, in reality, a glaring amateur. It's beyond pathetic; it's comical. In an era where advanced technology and AI rule the roost, Facebook's inability to detect an account that reeks of fake identity is nothing short of absurd. "Lucy Audrey" is a male scammer from Faisalabad, Pakistan. It's so ludicrous that it's laughable. Facebook's (Oh, I mean Fakebook’s) Disheartening Betrayal is a slap in the face to anyone who values online safety and security. The platform's unwillingness to remove an account that blatantly peddles services it knows nothing about is an outrageous betrayal of user trust. Facebook's refusal to suspend this egregiously fake profile In my humble opinion, Facebook's algorithms appear finely tuned for one purpose: keeping user retention rates high, even at the expense of tolerating absurdly . They prioritize user retention over eradicating profiles run by individuals who couldn't distinguish a blog post from a hole in the ground. fake profiles Testing the Waters: A Tale of Deception Curiosity led me to test the waters. I decided to engage one of these dubious "experts" to place a blog post on a website for one of my digital marketing clients. The outcome was nothing short of a farce. The faker took my money, placed the content with a website owner, didn't pay the site owner, and disappeared with the entire payment. I was left with a case of fraud and an empty wallet. This is a prime example of Facebook's failure to protect its community. It's shocking how they allow these charlatans to roam free, masquerading as "professionals" and "experts." My experiment only cost me $10, and I'm grateful that at least PayPal has robust protections. The Farcical "Meta Verified" Badge In recent times, Facebook's attempt to monetize authenticity has reached new heights of absurdity. Every time I log in, a message hijacks my screen, urging me to get a "Meta Verified" badge for a mere $19.99 per month, as if paying for a digital badge can prove my existence. While Facebook pushes me, a legitimate user since its inception, to pay for a badge of authenticity, it remains plagued by thousands of obvious fake profiles, including the infamous "Lucy Audrey." Facebook's desperation for user retention has reached ridiculous levels. They even allow users to create four additional profiles under one account, opening the floodgates for imposters and scammers. I mean, what a joke! I have now gone on to report countless profiles that Fakebook refuses to suspend, and then in response, they wave the annoying Meta Verified badge in my face every day, “urging me” to hand over my hard-earned cash once a month to “verify myself.” Pathetic! The Sisyphean Task of Reporting Fake Profiles Picture this: Day in and day out, I've scoured Facebook, diligently reporting one fake profile after another. Each one is more obvious than the last, yet my efforts seem to fall on deaf ears. The frustration that accompanies hitting that "report" button has become a daily ritual, and it's one that always ends in disappointment. The 100% Ignored Reports Yes, you read that correctly - 100%. Every single report I've submitted, without exception, has been met with the crushing silence of Facebook's inaction. It's as if my concerns, along with those of countless others, vanish into the digital abyss, never to be acknowledged or addressed. The accounts I've reported are the epitome of fakery. They sport stolen images, nonsensical information, and a clear disregard for the platform's rules and regulations. It's not rocket science; it's plain as day. But it seems that Facebook's moderation team is blind to the most blatant transgressions. Yes, you read that correctly - 100%. Every single report I've submitted, without exception, has been met with the crushing silence of Facebook's inaction. It's as if my concerns, along with those of countless others, vanish into the digital abyss, never to be acknowledged or addressed. The accounts I've reported are the epitome of fakery, including fake profiles and even parasites who have attempted to scam me. They sport stolen images, nonsensical information, and a clear disregard for the platform's rules and regulations. It's not rocket science; it's plain as day. But it seems that Facebook's moderation team is blind to the most blatant transgressions. The Endless Loop of Inaction What's particularly frustrating is the endless loop of inaction. You'd think that a platform as massive and influential as Facebook would have the resources and technology to tackle this issue effectively. However, the reality is that countless individuals, including myself, are trapped in a cycle of reporting fake profiles with no end in sight. A Mockery of "Community Standards" Facebook's adherence to "Community Standards" is nothing short of a farce when it fails to protect users from scam artists like this Pakistani man’s alias " ." Lucy Audrey This incident is not isolated but a glaring example of Facebook's disregard for user safety and integrity. It's high time for Facebook to stop paying lip service to its users' concerns and take concrete action against fake profiles on its platform. In my tireless crusade to report fake profiles, I'm not alone. There are countless others who have experienced the same frustration, the same disappointment, and the same betrayal of trust. It's time for Facebook to step up, take action, and fulfill its responsibility to its users. The evidence is clear: countless fake profiles roam free on Facebook, and the platform's disregard for these transgressions is nothing short of a slap in the face. It's a betrayal of user trust, and it’s high time for Facebook to rectify this glaring issue. It's also clear that Mr. Zuckerberg couldn't care less about the safety of Facebook’s users. As long as the cash keeps rolling in and stocks remain high, it appears that this social media platform will continue to fling the floodgates wide open for scammers and fake profile parasites.

Meet Lucy Audrey, The Dishonest Fake Profile Facebook Refuses to Suspend

লুসি অড্রের সাথে দেখা করুন, অসৎ জাল প্রোফাইল ফেসবুক সাসপেন্ড করতে অস্বীকার করেছে

Lernen Sie Lucy Audrey kennen, das unehrliche Fake-Profil, das Facebook nicht sperren lässt

Conoce a Lucy Audrey, el perfil falso deshonesto que Facebook se niega a suspender

Rencontrez Lucy Audrey, le faux profil malhonnête que Facebook refuse de suspendre

लूसी ऑड्रे से मिलें, बेईमान नकली प्रोफ़ाइल फेसबुक ने निलंबित करने से इनकार कर दिया

Facebookが停止を拒否した不誠実な偽プロフィール、ルーシー・オードリーを紹介する

부정직한 가짜 프로필인 Lucy Audrey를 만나보세요. Facebook은 정지를 거부합니다.

Conheça Lucy Audrey, o perfil falso desonesto que o Facebook se recusa a suspender

Знакомьтесь, Люси Одри, нечестный фейковый профиль, который Facebook отказывается приостанавливать

Facebook'un Askıya Almayı Reddettiği Sahtekar Sahte Profil Lucy Audrey ile tanışın

Gặp Lucy Audrey, Hồ sơ giả mạo không trung thực Facebook từ chối đình chỉ

认识露西·奥黛丽 (Lucy Audrey)，Facebook 拒绝暂停不诚实的虚假个人资料

I've had it up to here with Facebook's ongoing indifference when it comes to tackling the persistent issue of fake profiles and fraudulent operations in the digital marketing sphere. In an industry that's constantly evolving and demanding adaptability, Facebook's lackluster approach is a thorn in our collective sides. Fake profiles and fraudulent activities on social media platforms have been a pain in our necks for ages. Whether it's identity theft, spamming, or fake advertisements, these shenanigans wreak havoc on businesses and consumers alike. But Facebook, the Goliath of social networks seems content with giving only to address these problems. lip service We've seen this tired old script play out time and time again. Facebook acknowledges the problem, throws out some vague promises of change, and then, like a magician with no tricks up his sleeve, delivers next to nothing. It's infuriating, to say the least. So, what's the big deal? Why should we care about these fake profiles and scams? The consequences are much more profound than Facebook seems to realize. Trust, my friends, trust is the most valuable currency in the digital marketing world. When you undermine that trust with deceptive practices, you compromise the authenticity of the connections and interactions that are the lifeblood of the digital marketing landscape Users start becoming skeptics, second-guessing even legitimate content, and worst of all, deciding to leave digital spaces altogether. For businesses, the financial toll is real. They're forced into this endless cat-and-mouse game with . They invest countless resources combating these scams that could be better spent on growth and innovation. And let's not forget the damage to their reputation when their customers fall prey to these fraudulent operations. Facebook fraudsters But the most exasperating question of all: Why hasn't Facebook, with all its power and resources, been more effective in tackling these issues? They've dabbled in efforts here and there, but it feels like they're playing a perpetual game of catch-up instead of being proactive. It's time for Facebook to step up its game and take a more assertive stance. No more half-measures, no more empty promises. It's high time they send a clear message to those misusing their platform: fraud and deception will not be tolerated. Yet, the responsibility doesn't lie solely with Facebook. This issue demands a concerted effort from the entire digital marketing community and the public. It's not a problem just for users. It's a collective challenge that Facebook, as a major player in the digital landscape, must address proactively. Facebook, The Colossal Letdown! Oh, Facebook, you colossal letdown! It's infuriating how this social media giant continues to shield scammers, spammers, fake profiles, and allows fraudulent operations to persist. The fact that Facebook still hasn't managed to tackle the plague of fake profiles and fraudulent activities is mind-boggling. It's like watching a never-ending circus of deception and deceit, where the bad actors thrive, while the rest of us are left exasperated and defenseless. Fake Profiles Let's talk about fake profiles, shall we? These nefarious imposters invade the platform, stealing people's identities and spreading disinformation with reckless abandon. You'd think that with Facebook's resources and technology, they'd have a handle on this by now. But no, the fake profiles continue to multiply, clogging our feeds with spurious content, scammy links, and downright lies. Spammers And what about the spammers? Facebook, it's as if you're hosting a never-ending spamfest where users are inundated with unsolicited advertisements and scams. These spammers parade around, exploiting the platform for personal gain while the rest of us are left to wade through the digital garbage they leave behind. Fraudulent Operations The real kicker is how Facebook allows fraudulent operations to flourish, even when they're blatantly reported. It's as if they're turning a blind eye to the cries of their users, letting these scammers run wild. How many times have we reported these fraudulent accounts and activities, only to see them continue unimpeded, like cockroaches surviving a nuclear apocalypse? One would expect that a platform as influential and ubiquitous as Facebook would have a robust system in place to weed out these charlatans. Yet, instead of being proactive, they react sluggishly, offering empty promises of change that never materialize. It's a disservice to its users, both individuals and businesses, who depend on the platform to connect, communicate, and conduct business. It’s about time Facebook to take real, decisive action against these bad actors, to step up and do their part to protect the integrity of their platform. It’s also time the tech giant to take a hard look in the mirror and make the necessary changes to create a safer, more trustworthy digital space for all. The tolerance of deception must come to an end. The frustration is palpable. Facebook's unwillingness to address the issue of scammers, spammers, fake profiles, and fraudulent operations is not only disappointing but also a disservice to the online community. Users deserve better, and the digital world, in general, should not have to suffer under the weight of Facebook's indifference. So, here's my rallying cry: Let's stop waiting around for Facebook to do the right thing. They must prioritize transparency, honesty, and accountability. But we, the digital marketing community and the broader public, need to get off our duffs and take a stand. Let's actively engage with this issue, demand accountability, and support initiatives to eradicate fraudulent practices. In a nutshell, the digital marketing industry thrives when it's built on trust and transparency. Facebook's reluctance to decisively tackle fake profiles and fraudulent operations is a hindrance to progress. It's time to raise our collective voice, demand accountability, and work together to create a safer, more honest digital marketing landscape that benefits everyone. It's time for action; it's time for change.

Facebook's Inexcusable Tolerance for Fake Profiles and Fraudulent Operations

ফেইক প্রোফাইল এবং প্রতারণামূলক অপারেশনের জন্য ফেসবুকের অমার্জনীয় সহনশীলতা

Facebooks unentschuldbare Toleranz gegenüber gefälschten Profilen und betrügerischen Operationen

La imperdonable tolerancia de Facebook hacia los perfiles falsos y las operaciones fraudulentas

La tolérance inexcusable de Facebook à l'égard des faux profils et des opérations frauduleuses

फर्जी प्रोफाइल और धोखाधड़ीपूर्ण संचालन के लिए फेसबुक की अक्षम्य सहनशीलता

Facebookの偽プロフィールと不正行為に対する許しがたい寛容さ

가짜 프로필 및 사기 행위에 대한 Facebook의 변명할 수 없는 관용

A tolerância indesculpável do Facebook para perfis falsos e operações fraudulentas

Непростительная терпимость Facebook к фейковым профилям и мошенническим операциям

Facebook'un Sahte Profillere ve Hileli Operasyonlara Karşı Bağışlanamaz Toleransı

Sự khoan dung không thể tha thứ của Facebook đối với hồ sơ giả mạo và hoạt động lừa đảo

Facebook 对虚假个人资料和欺诈操作的不可原谅的容忍

USA v. Google LLC Court Filing, retrieved on January 24, 2023 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 25 of 44. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here IV. GOOGLE’S SCHEME TO DOMINATE THE AD TECH STACK D. Google Responds to the Threat of Header Bidding by Further Excluding Rivals and Reinforcing Its Dominance 2. Google Blunts Header Bidding By “Drying Out” the Competition b) Google Further Stunts Header Bidding by Working to Bring Facebook and Amazon into Its Open Bidding Fold 187. Even before the rise of header bidding, Google had identified Facebook as a potential competitive threat. Facebook had at one point shown ambitions to challenge Google as a full-stack ad tech competitor, acquiring a publisher ad server in 2013 and a video advertising SSP in 2014, though both products were later shuttered. Years later, Facebook recognized that any full-stack ad tech strategy “is subject to one bottleneck and intermediary—Google. They ‘own’ the Ad Server, and hence the last mile relationship with publishers.” Facebook further observed that “[o]ther players in the market, such as Amazon, recognize that unseating Google, and its relationships with publishers is hard, and are also choosing to build on top of Google’s rails.” 188. Though it had abandoned its efforts to be a full-stack competitor, Facebook still aimed to grow its advertising business beyond its owned and operated (“O&O”) digital properties (e.g., Facebook Blue and Instagram apps), which were increasingly supplyconstrained. As the number of advertisers on these properties grew, demand threatened to outpace available inventory; Facebook sought publisher inventory outside Facebook to satisfy this unmet advertising demand. In 2014, it launched Facebook Audience Network (“FAN”), which Facebook described as the “power of Facebook ads, off-Facebook.” FAN allowed Facebook advertisers to extend their campaigns outside of Facebook O&O properties with a oneclick, opt-in button. 189. At launch, FAN primarily worked with mobile app advertisers to place ads in other mobile apps in order to drive app installs and engagement. It later expanded to open web on mobile devices. By 2016, FAN was participating in the growing header bidding movement, partnering with header bidding wrappers to submit real-time, simultaneous bids, and eventually launching full-scale header bidding in 2017. 190. As a large ad network connected to millions of Facebook advertisers, FAN also competed with Google to lock up available publisher inventory for its advertisers. Prior to joining Open Bidding, Facebook executives foresaw a status quo of “hand-to-hand combat” between the companies to secure access to sufficient inventory from publishers. Google feared such competition with Facebook would end up “eat[ing] margin,” and that Google might “respond identically” through deals with top publishers, thus “driving a price war.” Facebook was equally leery of such a future, with one executive fretting that the “significant investment required to lock up inventory through direct deals” with publishers would “[l]ikely start a race to the bottom on margin.” 191. Google took note of FAN’s launch and kept a wary eye on FAN as it grew, describing Facebook as “a unique competitive challenge for us, both short- and long-term” because of its “strength in ad formats and targeting.” Google understood Facebook’s reach with over a billion users, and it understood that just as Google had valuable targeting and demographic data from its O&O properties—including Search, Gmail, YouTube, Android, and Play Store—Facebook, too, had a massive amount of valuable data from its O&O properties. Even though Facebook had largely given up on building a direct competitor to Google’s publisher ad tech stack, Google saw looming “[d]isintermediation [t]hreats” to DFP from “[l]arge [n]etworks with unique data and advertiser scale seek[ing] direct inventory access[,] [g]oing direct to pubs or using existing [third-party] channels like Header Bidding.” By contrast, Google characterized full-stack competitors as “historical competition” of little concern: “This is a short-term threat and we are well positioned here.” 192. As FAN began to test and use header bidding, Google grew increasingly alarmed at “the existential threat posed by Header Bidding and FAN.” Google strategized over how to respond to FAN’s entry into header bidding, and in September 2016, Google laid out a plan to bring FAN into Google’s Open Bidding program. Significantly, Google concluded that bringing FAN demand into Open Bidding was a better alternative to slow publisher adoption of header bidding than “[a]ggressively mak[ing] [Open Bidding] much better than [header bidding].” 3. Rather than making a better product and competing on the merits, Google sought a deal with Facebook to bring FAN into Google’s Open Bidding—away from rival exchanges’ header bidding auctions—to “dry out” the nascent threat posed by header bidding. If competition with Facebook was inevitable, it would be better for Google to compete on a field it still controlled, with the many advantages it had constructed for itself, thus protecting DFP’s market dominance. Indeed, Google concluded that while it “[c]annot avoid competing with FAN,” it could, through a deal with Facebook, “build a moat around our demand.” And as Google’s product leadership would ultimately recommend to CEO Sundar Pichai, with a Google-Facebook deal, “[f]or web inventory, we will move [FAN’s] demand off of header bidding set up and further weaken the header bidding narrative in the marketplace.” Facebook, meanwhile, was frank in its assessment of Google’s motivation for the deal: “What Google wants: To kill header bidding (us baptizing [Open Bidding] will help significantly).” 194. Ultimately, in September 2018, after a long negotiation and approvals by each company’s top brass—including Pichai, Mark Zuckerberg, and Sheryl Sandberg—Google and Facebook entered into a “Network Bidding Agreement” (“NBA”). The deal provided Facebook with unique terms, including a contractual promise of no last look and direct remittance to publishers, ensuring that Facebook would continue to maintain its publisher-facing relationships. In exchange, Facebook committed to a minimum annual spend on Open Bidding and was incentivized, through an all-units, tiered volume discount, to shift spend to Open Bidding and away from possible alternative header bidding avenues. 195. Having tried and failed to challenge Google as full-stack competitor—in part because of Google’s anticompetitive conduct described above—Facebook ultimately resigned itself to operating on top of Google’s rails. While the NBA satisfied Facebook’s need for increased access to publisher inventory, Facebook recognized that it would also “reduce our future optionality to build our own ad tech and the likelihood of a newbie like Amazon[, which had introduced a header bidding wrapper,] succeeding.” Facebook believed that, while perhaps “inevitable,” the deal would nevertheless “accelerate Google’s stranglehold on ad tech.” Facebook’s then-VP of Partnerships opined that “by doing this deal, we will cement [Google’s] position of power.” 196. Amazon’s TAM posed a different competitive threat to Google’s dominance. It allowed publishers to solicit bids from multiple ad exchanges via a single call from a webpage to Amazon’s extensive network of servers. And Amazon took only a small one cent CPM fee— much lower than Open Bidding’s 5% fee—for every transaction that flowed through TAM. Google initially feared TAM could aggregate advertising demand in a way that challenged Google’s ad exchange and publisher ad server, leading Google to ask Amazon what it would take for Amazon to stop investing in its header bidding product. However, Amazon rebuffed such requests and continued to develop and deploy TAM. But as with other header bidding solutions, TAM could not fully circumvent all of the restrictions and preferences baked into Google’s ad tech products, which website publishers still relied upon. For example, TAM remained subject to a “last look” by Google’s ad exchange, allowing Google’s ad exchange to win any impression that would otherwise flow through TAM by matching the competing price from TAM. 197. Google’s Open Bidding—and Google’s efforts to shift the focus of other major ad tech companies like Facebook from header bidding toward Open Bidding—stunted header bidding’s adoption, leaving header bidding unable to pose a true threat to Google’s monopoly power. In doing so, Open Bidding achieved its goal of blunting the growth of header bidding and protecting Google’s publisher ad server. Today, Google still has its publisher ad server monopoly. Header bidding persisted, but its adoption stagnated. And Google turned to other, more surreptitious methods to restrain competition and “dry out” ad exchanges using header bidding. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 1:23-cv-00108 retrieved on September 8, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. justice.gov

Google Brings Facebook and Amazon into Its Open Bidding Fold

Google incorpora a Facebook y Amazon a su proceso de licitación abierta

Google intègre Facebook et Amazon dans son programme d'enchères ouvertes

Google Facebook और Amazon को अपने ओपन बिडिंग फोल्ड में लाता है

Google、FacebookとAmazonを自社の公開入札に参加させる

Google traz Facebook e Amazon para seu grupo de licitações abertas

Google đưa Facebook và Amazon vào cuộc đấu thầu mở

谷歌将 Facebook 和亚马逊纳入公开竞价范围

Today, around 25% of Facebook accounts , with 70% of the victims being locked out of their accounts. And in many cases, the victim has no idea they've been hacked until it's too late. have been compromised 6 Signs Your Facebook Account Has Been Hacked Here are some signs that someone is poking around your Facebook account: You find strange posts in your timeline. Some of your personal details have been altered(user name, birthday, email) You find friend requests sent to people you don’t know. Your password has been changed. An increased amount of spam or suspicious links. Complaints from friends about strange messages or posts coming from your account. How to Confirm That Your Facebook Account Has Been Hacked Once you suspect that your account has been compromised, you can easily confirm by clicking on your profile picture in the top right corner and then clicking . \ Settings & Privacy After that, click . Settings In the top left corner, select , then click . Password and Security Password and Security Finally, under the section, ensure all active portals are associated with you. \ Device Logins How to Avoid Your Facebook Account Being Hacked To stop your Facebook account from being hacked, you’ll have to be very proactive in three different ways: Password Protection Privacy Settings Human Error 1. Password Protection It’s easy to make mistakes when it comes to picking out a password. For example, use the same password for more than one account online. These types of common mistakes lead to accounts getting hacked every day. two-thirds of Americans Here are some ways to make sure your password is as secure as humanly possible: Create A Strong and Secure Password Once a hacker learns your Facebook password, it’s all over. Your password needs to be easy enough for you to remember (or store somewhere) and long enough to be impossible to guess. One of the best ways to make sure that your password is strong is by including numbers, symbols, and a mix of upper and lower case letters. Safely Store Your Password If your password is one that’s not easy to remember, make sure to write the phrase down and store it somewhere only you know how to access. You can also use a password manager to store your computer's password safely. There may already be a password manager on your device, but it’s often best to find a password encrypting app that’s not built in. Create a Password Just For Facebook As a general rule, you should create a different password for every social media service you use. If a hacker gets your Facebook password, you don’t want them getting into your TikTok, Instagram, and other accounts as well. Make sure the strong password you create is just for Facebook. Change Your Password Every Six Months You can’t be too safe when it comes to password protection. Changing your password at least every six months makes it extremely difficult for hackers to crack it. This advice goes for any password you have. 2. Privacy Settings Facebook is aware of the problems that many of its users have when it comes to their accounts getting hacked. As a countermeasure, Facebook has provided a few privacy settings you can use to help protect yourself: Enable Two-factor Authentication You can think of two-factor authentication as an extra layer of protection that keeps unethical hackers from poking around your account. This is done by forcing you to authenticate your account by sending you a text message to confirm it’s actually you signing in. To enable two-faster authentication: Click on your profile picture, then open up the settings. In the top right corner, click . Password and Security Under , click again, then select . Account Settings Password and Security Two-factor Authentication From here, follow the on-screen prompts to turn this option on. Use Login Alerts If you really want to feel safe about your account security, you can receive an alert every time someone logs into your account. Once you know someone has logged in that’s not you, you can try to quickly solve the problem before it’s too late. To turn on login alerts, click on your profile image and navigate to your settings. Then click on in both the and . Password and Security Accounts Center Account Settings In the settings, select . Security Checks Login Alerts Make Your Account Private One of the ways that hackers figure out your password is by piecing together clues from your personal information. You can limit the personal information these bad actors get from you by making your account private. You can do this by opening up the Privacy page in your settings, then, in the Your Activity section, click Edit at the end of the “Who can see your future posts” line. From there, follow the on-screen prompts to make your account private. 3. Human Error At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter how much protection you’ve surrounded yourself with if you let a scammer use social engineering against you. Here are some of the best ways to ensure that you don’t get tricked into giving your Facebook password: Don’t Accept Random Friend Requests One of the sneaky ways that scammers get your information is by creating fake accounts and befriending you. If you have your account set to tell your friends when your birthday is, for example, a scammer account in your friends list will be notified about your birthday and then use that information against you. To be safe, only accept friend requests from people you know. Only Use Trusted Computers Avoid using public computers to log in to Facebook as much as you can. You never know who the next person who uses the computer will be and if they are a good or bad actor. If you absolutely have to use a public computer, just make sure to log out of your account the second you leave. Block Suspicious People If someone you’re interacting with seems fishy and you don’t know who they are personally, block them. There are plenty of good people on the internet and you don’t need to deal with suspicious people. Going on a blocking spree is better than getting your account stolen. Final Thoughts Although hundreds of Facebook accounts get hacked daily, it’s easy to protect yourself once you know what to do. Make sure to follow the tips above to keep unethical hackers out of your account, and share this article with anyone you know who’s worried about their account getting stolen.

Stories, News & Mentions about FACEBOOK

Facebook’s Stories on HackerNoon

Facebook's News & Mentions