visit
The concept of “Network State” has been a hot topic since the 2022 release of Balaji's book on the topic. This is not a new concept and draws many inspirational sources like , , and . However, I believe the term "Network State" is too limiting and implies sovereign political power. While Balaji’s framework of offline → online and small → large is accurate, he over-imposes his own ideals and ambitions, narrowing the possibilities to only those who want to create their own nation-state.
| Description | Liberland | Zuzalu | Cabin DAO | Cohere | Praxis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Defining Characteristic | In a word, the driving purpose of the community | Libertarianism | Lunarpunk techno-optimism | Live in nature | Spiritual coliving | Crypto startup city |
Inception | When the first organized physical meeting of members happened | December 2015 | March 2023 | July 2021 | June 2022 | N/A |
Population |
| ~900 | ~900 | ~300 | ~400 | ~100 |
Motto |
| “To live and let live.” | “Build popup playgrounds for innovators.” | “Colive with friends in nature” | “Create conscious community” |
|
Differentiator |
| Newest, most innovative nation in the world | The first pop-up city | Crypto x Nature x Art | Wholesome af fam | Embedded government incubation |
Website |
| //liberland.org/en/ | //zuzalu.city/ | //cabin.city/ | //www.cohere.network/ | //www.praxissociety.com/ |
Primary Social Media |
| //twitter.com/Liberland_org | Private Telegram | //twitter.com/cabindotcity | //www.instagram.com/coherenetwork | //twitter.com/CityofPraxis |
Longform Intro | Easiest way to get a holistic sense of the Coordination | //liberland.org/en/constitution | (no official sources) //www.lifespan.io/news/zuzalu-shining-city-on-the-black-mountain | //creators.mirror.xyz/zHox-AfvHbX0Q2JxAbcfwiAmOXRy7BzYafhZNlvHnmM | //alistairlanger.de/projects/cohere/ | //www.cityofpraxis.com/master-plan |
Land Acquisition Strategy | How are they creating physical spaces for permanent establishments? | Squatting uncontested international land (terra nullius) | N/A | Individual, voluntary land access | Crowdfunding to purchase + REIT investors | Crowdfunding + government partnerships |
Cultural Homogeneity | Is there a singular, all-encompassing culture (Japan) or many mixed together with a unifying vision (America) | Homogenous | Heterogenous | Heterogenous | Homogenous | Homogenous |
Time/Space | Does it exist for a short time and change locations, or is it a single space over a long time or multiple permanent locations that you can travel between? | perpetual + unitary | ephemeral + unitary | perpetual + omnipresent | perpetual + omnipresent / ephemeral + unitary | perpetual + unitary |
Citizenship Benefits |
| N/A | Access to social networks and tooling | //cabin-fellowship.notion.site/Cabin-Citizenship-071295e889284c12a3aeb6f66ffc2d65 | //www.cohere.network/membership/benefits | //www.praxissociety.com/plan |
Citizenship Application |
| //liberland.org/en/citizenship | N/A | //cabin.city/ | //www.cohere.network/membership/benefits | //www.praxissociety.com/apply |
Sovereign or EndoSymbiont | Do they want to have political sovereignty and own country or exist within the bounds of existing States. | Sovereign | EndoSymbiont | EndoSymbiont | EndoSymbiont | EndoSymbiont |
Github |
| //github.com/liberland/ | //github.com/zuzaluorg/ | //github.com/CabinDAO | N/A | N/A |
While distinct in their individual cultures, the explored CoordiNations share some demographic and values-based attributes. They all have pretty well-defined cultures, either explicitly created themselves or implicitly from the communities that they recruit from. While they share a lot of obvious commonalities - mostly 20-30-year-olds, creative knowledge workers, digital nomads, tech-savvy, upper-middle class, progressivism + classical liberalism political viewpoints simultaneously, and solar punk futurists. Liberland is more of an outlier, having older members with a more conservative/cyberpunk mindset. Of the 3, I’ve spent significant time with members individually and as a group; they are all wholesome af. They not only care deeply about each other, they care about helping others and the world. They all also have a focus on mental and physical health for their members, with some also focusing on the environment and regenerative systems. Using open-source software for their infrastructure and their laws/community codes to allow anyone to propose changes, track these changes, and automatically publish them is common but not a standard. And, of course, cryptocurrencies and DAOs are a big component of all their offerings and visions as well.
Liberland has the most international geopolitical recognition. Their strategy is to get accepted into the United Nations by getting five current member states to recognize them officially. They have connections to officials in the US, EU, UN, and many other political organizations. However, this hasn’t helped them much in their relations with Croatia, who, , was actively blockading Liberlanders from accessing their land, building infrastructure, and doing trade with Serbia. Although I haven’t been to any community gatherings, they feel like they have the strongest will to exist and the most coherent, if simplistic, culture and vision. This leads me to believe that Liberland has the best chance of actually becoming a thing, which is great because its legitimacy lifts up all others in the movement.
Zuzalu isn’t aiming to have a single place or organization but rather a way of . They are building tools for people to organize popup playgrounds related to open-source technology, health, science, and social innovation. What I call “village tech”—is focused on enabling community, collaboration, and hands-on learning in physical spaces and local communities via messaging, ticketing, identity, events, calendars, polling, funding, and everything else needed for in-depth engagement from large groups of people. Even without their tech stack developed yet, Zuzalians are already self-organizing meetups, events, and coliving all around the world months after Zuzalu “officially” ended, making it more active than the other groups despite having the least coordinated effort to become a permanent physical establishment.
Cabin DAO I find the most interesting because of its decentralized approach, where land ownership is retained by individual members who voluntarily provide access to land, resources, and services. This means that all the CoordiNations can co-exist within the Cabin network while retaining autonomy. Rather than competing for dominance, Cabin DAO facilitates discovery and cross-pollination of emerging communities, similar to how Zuzalu’s tech will likely become the core stack for coordinating IRL.
Cohere is more spiritually oriented than the others; it feels more like a large family than a group of values-aligned individuals. They also focus on real estate acquisition, acting as a tokenized with a rent-to-own model for members. Cohere has a dual model where the community doesn’t just take over a location but tries to integrate with the existing community to help them leverage the value of the Cohere members and services that come through the space. Part of that offering is fractionalizing and tokenizing land so existing landowners can retain partial ownership while letting Cohere and Co have skin in the game.
Also published .