visit
COPA v. Wright, Court Filing, retrieved on January 29, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part of this filing here. This is the table of links with all parts.
Case Number: IL- and IL-
Plaintiffs: Crypto Open Patent Alliance
Defendant: Dr. Craig Steven Wright
Filing Date: January 29, 2024
Location: High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England & Wales, Intellectual Property list (ChD)
An illustration of the intricacies and depths of Dr Wright’s forgeries
The LATEX files: Main.tex and E-Cash-main.tex
(i) Dr Wright’s main LaTeX file “main.tex”, “Candidate L” {H/340/1}
(ii) Dr Wright’s “electronic cash” LaTeX file “E-Cash-main.tex”, “Candidate C” {H/331/1}
“Project BlackNet” paper (Reliance Document) {ID_001379} / {L1/79/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal (d) ConclusionLLM Dissertation proposal 2 (Reliance Document) {ID_000217} / {L2/131/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal (d) ConclusionHandwritten BDO Minutes (Reliance Document) {ID_004013} / {L2/159/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal (d) Conclusions“A Competing Transaction or Block Model” {ID_004682} {L1/367/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal (d) Conclusion“Hash Based Shadowing” (Scanned Manuscript Document) {ID_004729} {PTRF/86/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s RebuttalVariations on “Secure and Trustworthy Voting” {ID_004732} {PTR-F/89/1} and {ID_004734} {PTR-F/91/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal“Internal Controls…Backend Operations” {ID_004733} {PTR-F/90/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal“LPA.tex” and “LP1.tex” {ID_004722} {PTR-F/79/1} and {ID_004723} {PTRF/80/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s RebuttalTominaka Nakamoto: Monumenta Nipponica {ID_004019} / {L2/245/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal (d) ConclusionOpenOffice 2.4 document (Reliance Document) {ID_000260} / {L2/294/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal (d) ConclusionEmail: “I need your help editing a paper I am going to release” (1) {ID_000465}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal (d) Conclusions“Block diffusion within bitcoin” (Reliance Document) {ID_000367} / {L3/185/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal (d) ConclusionThe SSRN Submission (Particulars of Claim at [30]-[35] {A/2/10}) The Fourth Pleaded Example
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal (c) ConclusionEconomics of BitCoin Nodes (Reliance Document) {ID_000227} / {L3/219/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal (d) Conclusion“Noncooperative finite games” (Reliance Document) {ID_000396} / {L3/203/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal (d) ConclusionCoffee-stained printout of Bitcoin White Paper (Reliance Document) {ID_004011} / {L2/234/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal (d) Conclusion“Economic Security.doc” (Reliance Document) {ID_000258} / {L3/286/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal (d) ConclusionC++ Code {ID_004712} {PTR-F/69/1} and {ID_004713} {PTR-F/70/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal (d) ConclusionConverted Code2Flow source code flowchart (Reliance Document) {ID_000554} / {L3/326/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal (d) ConclusionSpoofed email from Dr Wright in the name of Satoshi Nakamoto (1) {ID_001546} / {L8/338/1}
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal(d) ConclusionThe Sartre Message (Particulars of Claim at [23]-[25] {A/2/8}) The First Pleaded Example
(a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery (b) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal (c) ConclusionThe MYOB Ontier email (aka ‘the Ramona Version’) dated 18 February 2024.
(a) Background (b) The email (c) COPA’s Allegation (d) Dr Wright’s contention (e) The timestamps and other points raised by Dr Wright. (f) Conclusion