visit
In seconds, Amazon gives you access to millions of products, each with their own set of environmental issues. As the Lightning Deal timer goads you on, shoppers rarely look up from their search to ask, “Do I even need this [insert random tech gadget here]”, let alone “How will this purchase damage the environment?".
As a shopper, you continue on. After cross-examining just a few more options, you finally check out and ride that post-purchase high. You’ve won, but have you really?
We can’t fault you — all the ‘exclusive’ deals sound pretty sweet. Last year, Prime members bought more than . Features like Amazon’s ordering make it so easy. However, cheap deals and Prime shipping come at a huge hidden environmental cost that don’t show up on the checkout page.
As you and the hundreds of millions of Prime shoppers scroll through Amazon, the environmental impact begins to add up. Just last year, with , Prime Day shoppers orderedMaterials
The demand generated for your Echo and many other electronics fuel the metal extraction industry–the irreversible excavation to obtain non-renewable materials such as coal, copper, and silver. These materials take significant energy to extract and the processes are incredibly damaging and practically irreversible to the environment. Your Echo earns its first strike before it’s even in the factory.Manufacturing
The production of the Echo’s components from the silicon chips to the circuit boards requires extreme precision, making the manufacturing stage the most energy intensive portion. Even worse, the final stage of manufacturing comes at a human cost — workers at FoxConn, one of Amazon’s suppliers and manufacturers of Echos,Distribution/Transportation
Current delivery systems are not built to efficiently consolidate and deliver packages to shoppers’ doorsteps within two days, according to , from the Institute for Transportation Studies at the University of California Davis. With the rush of Prime shipping, Prime Day and other mass shopping holidays are contributing more congestion to our cities, pollutants to our air, and packaging waste to our landfills.Usage
The energy usage of an Amazon Echo is quite low. In contrast to the permanent damage of mining the raw materials for the Echo, most users hold onto theirs for a few years before disposing of it.Destruction
Majority of the cost of recycling this cheap Echo lands on , most of them already overburdened with e-waste. , when our electronic waste often ends up in landfills, they have the potential to leak toxic materials like lead and mercury into the air, water, and soil, posing serious environmental and health risks.All things considered, is this Echo really worth it?
We don’t think so. This might sound too good to be true but the best we can do right now is be more mindful —as renowned climate activist Ayana Johnson urges, we must “Refuse. Reuse. Repurpose. Repair. Reduce.”
We calculate the carbon footprint of your product by accounting for entire lifecycle of your product, factoring in all material and energy inputs, transportation, storage, and waste outputs generated throughout the life of a good. The data required for these calculations are sourced from CleanMetrics' CarbonScopeData database, one of the largest and most comprehensive LCI databases in North America.
All offsets are directed to various projects provided by , an organization established by WWF and other international NGOs. The projects we donate to range from reforestation to regenerative agriculture efforts to sequester carbon. The most recent offset project we've been contributing to is the , a reforestation initiative for the Nicaragua Forest. The Neutral community is growing in both size and impact — to date, we've offset over 54,000 kilograms of carbon dioxide as a community.If you have any other questions or feedback, reach us at [email protected].