visit
By the way, most people knew who Nader was since the beginning. His identity was revealed in various news articles already and BitClout's pitch deck used to be online. He wasn't really that pseudonymous to begin with.This leads me to the next point, which is that the platform didn't feel too decentralized to begin with. I didn't like how mining all of the sudden stopped, how some projects were favored over others, or just the way many things were handled. Even the original seed or first dibs on automatically generated creator coins seemed a little bit out of hand. Also, BitClout seemed to have rebranded itself or its direction multiple times. The focus on creator coins has now shifted towards more of a focus on generating DAOs.
BitClout/DeSo promised to be the future. However, I think they had many chances to be more decentralized, transparent, and mission-driven. Instead, this seems like Basis all over again.
That being said, I want them to succeed, but with the way that their platform has been developed, the actions taken afterwards, and so forth, I don't know if they will. Nobody has tried developing more apps on DeSo than me. In a way, I am rooting for Nader, but also the accountability advocate.
That said, none of this article is meant to be taken as financial advice. Do your own due diligence. Businesses and companies like BitClout/DeSo are highly speculative.