visit
In summary: they did not work as expected. To be fair to them, my testing was not very scientific as I only got a few random malicious domains from pishtank, malware domains and my email, and expected them to be blocked. So maybe .. that was expected.
However, that got me thinking .. What about our children? If they were not able to block access to malicious domains, would they be able to block access to porn? I assume the majority of people using these services are actually looking to block access to adult content for their kids. Would they at least be able to do a good job there?
Out of the 88 porn domains, I expected all of them to be blocked. They were ranked on the search engines and easily found online. Only CleanBrowsing blocked them all, with Norton SafeConnect very close in second place by missing 5 domains:
Neustar and AdGuard were not good at all, missing even some of the popular sites. Full table of results is on this link: Partial screenshot of the pastebin with the results (medium doesn't make it easy to import a table):
CleanBrowsing: 100% blockedNorton: 94% blocked (83 blocked, 5 not blocked)Yandex: 93% blocked (82 blocked, 6 not blocked)OpenDNS: 89% blocked (79 blocked, 9 not blocked): 81% blocked (72 blocked, 16 not blocked)AdGuard: 55% blocked (55 blocked, 39 not blocked)
There are many easy to use free proxies that should be blocked when you are filtering access to pornographic content. When testing the top 10 free proxy domains, only OpenDNS and CleanBrowsing blocked all of them.
None of the other services tried to block access to proxies. I would give them a -1 for making it easy to bypass their own filters.
Google offers a way to force Safe Search via DNS and only Yandex, AdGuard and enforced them. That's a big plus for these 3 services for that.