visit
Yet these are details many happily share, knowingly or unknowingly, when they get online, with complete strangers, be it people or companies. A surprising amount of people actually do know they "over-share" information, but seem to think "it is alright, it isn't like Google/Facebook/Microsoft/whoever would be able to do anything with it anyways" and sort of picture the , the founders of Google, and who indeed look like very nice people (as opposed to the ).
“Saying you don’t care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is like saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say” — E.Snowden
Another misconception too many people have is "I have nothing to hide" or "I'm not that interesting and I'm not involved in illegal activities, good luck with finding my details in the information haystack" without realising they are helping out in , in their roles of being easily led and controlled, because they can (easily) be found, categorized and used as micro-influencers. It isn't people sifting through all the data. Computers do. Computers are really really good at it too. That is what they do. That is why we build them and that is why we use them.
Have a look at the image to the right to see the draft over what "conclusions" about people Cambridge Analytica managed to compile in the Facebook scandal, based on the data they shared and how/who they interacted with others. This type of data was what managed Cambridge Analytica to successfully target large groups of people with just the right type of message triggers that made them vote in particular ways, in a controlled fashion.
Let’s make a test: go to this website and let it load fully: That is mainly to get a "blueprint" of facts, that we later can compare with. If you are not connected to a VPN, it is quite likely that you will see your current Internet Protocol (IP, or in this case abbreviated "IPv4") address under the headline saying "My IP Information".
Below that there are headlines saying "Geolocation Info" and "Host Info". The G geolocation is the location information that service is guessing you are on, i.e. an attempt at guessing your physical actual location. The Host Info section is that service guessing who is your internet provider.
Now, this service overlaps to some degree with the first link, however, it provides even more information. You can compare the information given on the first link with the second link, which was the main reason for the first link anyways, so you can see neither site just produces made-up mumbo-jumbo that you can't check/verify yourself. Both sites should be showing the same information.
The information presented on this second service is what any/all websites can extract from you, just by you visiting them. I'm not saying all web sites/services does extract this data from you, but I'm saying that they can, should they choose to. Many do. This is before you start typing things into form fields (leaking information), or before you even start clicking on links or other things (selections that can be catalogued).
The reason I point this out is because for example advertising networks often place either a string of code on the page they have their advertisement on, or they present an image on the page you visit, but that code or image is in reality hosted somewhere else, on another server, that they control. Simply visiting one web site URL therefore can mean you are actually giving away this data to several companies at the same time.
Having the exact, or even the approximate, address of someone is perfect for advertising purposes. They can easily check the median salary of that neighbourhood, house prices, shopping patterns, political party affiliation percentage etc for our street etc even if they don't have my exact house. All of those things are open data that they just have to connect to, if they have something to go on. I/you just gave them that.
For example, regarding me it is obvious that I was using a very expensive iMac during my testing (I run all the OS’s) which is a couple of years old though, running the latest software of everything. I might be in the market for purchasing another computer soon, right? But it also tells them, compared to my neighbours, that I probably spend more on computers and computer gear compared to others in my area. Any hi-tech advertising would probably not be amiss on me...or I might have surplus money to spend on something other they would like to push in my face. They could be wrong, but chances are they are quite good at these guessing games based on various criteria, in long chains of logic.
As I said above, this is before I've even started clicking on things or filled in any forms, which obviously can teach them a lot more, and quite probably can reveal my real and true identity.
Now, if we shift our focus back to Facebook and Google, they are services where you have literally agreed with them that they can save your profile. Your profile in turn can then be linked to various "". That metadata can contain everything they think is applicable to your profile, whether you like it or not, whilst they let you manage your own personal data (phone, email addresses, friends etc) to give you the illusion of control.
Even if you download "all your data" (of which they still can keep their copy), that is basically limited to the data you have provided to them, in various forms such as posts on a timeline, uploading photos, web sites you've browsed, who you are friends with etc. They will not be giving you their metadata about you, that they have created themselves based on you and your activities, mainly because they don't have to.
It is not only them though who can see your metadata: this is what they sell. This is their core product. They use that core product to develop various services for their paying customers. They cluster people (or their metadata) based on various criteria. Political affiliation. Willingness to spend. Your age group in your area. If you are easily influenced by your friends, etc.
If you now combined that with what I told you above, regarding code/images hosted on servers owned by other services that also can extract data from you, and you start to think about how many of the web sites you use that are not owned by Facebook and/or Google, but where you still can find a "login with Facebook" button or "login with Google" button, you also know that both Google and Facebook know when you've visited that other site. Especially if you are, like most, constantly logged in to Facebook/Google services. If you are using Google Chrome as your browser you are most likely logged in to your Google account anyways, and you are then providing Google with your history of web sites you've visited anways.
The only way to properly share anything via those buttons is if they pass along the exact web site address (URL) of where you are, otherwise your sharing would be pretty meaningless and go straight to the front-page of the site, not to the awesome yellow jeans you were watching and wished to share.
This means they know where you are, regardless of if you decide to share the post/article/product or not. As they already know who you are and you now are providing them with all the things you are interested in, their profile (and their metadata) about you is constantly growing. Digital storage (i.e. hard drives) is cheap though, and there is a lot of money to be made by knowing exactly what triggers you to purchase things, share things or make you do things. They just have to give you a small little push.
Finally, just don't take my word on it. Have a look at outlining what types of data Google and Facebook sit on regarding you, and the data you kind of suspect they know. Please note that this data does not include their metadata about you.
Previously published at .