visit
Native app: An application written for a specific platform using programming language and tools native to it (e.g. Java for Android or Swift for iOS).
Web app: A product designed to run in a browser and written in a web programming language (e.g. HTML, CSS, or JS).
Hybrid app: A mixed approach where an HTML-based app is encapsulated in a wrapper native to the platform.
In simple terms, a hybrid app is a web app embedded in a shell that eliminates the need for a browser. This approach streamlines some aspects of app development, reducing the time and cost of the process. However, it also introduces some constraints, which means it will be suitable in some use cases but not others.Cost
This advantage is particularly relevant for companies targeting multiple platforms with their product. The product consists of a core and a shell, and only the latter is native to the platform. This means businesses only need to develop a new shell and reuse the core web component on other platforms. This not only cuts down the time needed for rolling out a new version but also allows relying (largely) on a single codebase that is much easier to maintain.Flexibility
Aside from cost savings, the unified codebase makes it easier to keep the product up-to-date and fix bugs across all platforms. In addition to improving user experience, it may come in handy in a highly competitive environment where a strategically timed release may become a critical advantage.User Experience
The main difference between native and web apps is that the former provide complete access to the device’s capabilities, both hardware and software. This unlocks the full potential of the app and, understandably, improves user experience compared to that with web-based products. Hybrid development frameworks allow us to achieve a comparable result without investing in native development while at the same time retaining a unified feel across platforms. Now, it certainly does not exactly reach the UX brilliance of native apps, but makes up for it with consistency.Performance
Another advantage of direct access to the device’s native capabilities is performance. Web apps, which run on a remote server, just don’t have that smooth and seamless feel to them. With the hybrid approach, all performance-sensitive UI elements can be built natively, while those requiring network communication can be left on the web. Of course, some slowdown may still occur, yet it won’t be anywhere near that of web apps.Offline Support
The reliability and robustness of web apps is achieved by the fact that all their data is hosted online, which means the content can be accessed from any place with an Internet connection. The downside, of course, is that without a connection the user is essentially stranded. In hybrid apps, some functionality can be retained even in offline mode, which expands the reach to a broader target audience and improves the product’s usability.Performance: While hybrid apps outperform web ones by a wide margin, they still don’t quite reach the level of a native application. So, if you are developing a resource-heavy game or a tool that takes advantage of the phone’s hardware, be sure to check whether the hybrid approach can provide what you need.
Data management: Having a web-based core means that usage metrics can only be collected from users who have logged in. If user-generated data is a crucial part of your business model – hybrid apps may not be the thing you are looking for.
Autonomy: Hybrid apps are less Internet-dependent than their web counterparts, yet they are not fully autonomous. If your userbase expects full functionality at all times – make sure they are always within network coverage – or consider switching to native.