visit
Authors:
(1) Dominic Petrak, UKP Lab, Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany;
(2) Nafise Sadat Moosavi, Department of Computer Science, The University of Sheffield, United Kingdom;
(3) Ye Tian, Wluper, London, United Kingdom;
(4) Nikolai Rozanov, Wluper, London, United Kingdom;
(5) Iryna Gurevych, UKP Lab, Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany.
Manual Error Type Analysis and Taxonomies
Automatic Filtering for Potentially Relevant Dialogs
Conclusion, Limitation, Acknowledgments, and References
A Integrated Error Taxonomy – Details
B Error-Indicating Sentences And Phrases
C Automatic Filtering – Implementation
D Automatic Filtering – Sentence-Level Analysis
E Task-Oriented Dialogs – Examples
F Effectiveness Of Automatic Filtering – A Detailed Analysis
G Inter-Annotator Agreement – Detailed Analysis
I Hyperparameters and Baseline Experiments
J Human-Human Dialogs – Examples
To implement the automatic filtering (Section 5) we use PyTorch (Paszke et al., 2019), the Transformers library (Wolf et al., 2020), and the pretrained allmpnet-base-v2 Sentence-Transformer[10]. It is based on MPNet (Song et al., 2020) and finetuned on a large corpus of sentence pairs from multiple tasks and domains, e.g., Yahoo Answers (Zhang et al., 2015) and Reddit Comments (Henderson et al., 2019), using a contrastive objective. It is a 12- layer Transformer model with a vocabulary size of 30,527 words that calculates the cosine similarity between two sentences in a 768-dimensional dense vector space.
Our compute infrastructure consists of one Tesla V100-SXM3 GPU (with 32 GB memory) and it took an average of 76 mins to run automatic filtering on one dataset.
[10] Model page in the HuggingFace Model Hub, last accessed
This paper is under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 DEED license.