visit
. So why are we spending money to display multiple things simultaneously? If my email or social media feeds are available at a glance, then Iāll check them constantly. This isnāt just unnecessary, itās counter-productive. In a world of endless distractions, being able to focus on a single task for an extended period is a seriously valuable skill.
Deep work is becoming increasingly hard in our distraction filled economy, yet also becoming increasingly important and rare. The few who can spend their days on deep work will become extremely marketable and successful.
ā Cal Newport in āāOne monitor means my workāāāand only my workāāāis displayed front and center. Distractions stay out of sight, and thus, out of mind.
Does this look like a place to focus on aĀ task?
Two of the most valuable tasks we do on a daily basis require focusing on a single application for extended periods: Reading and writing. Both reading and writing benefit from the focus that comes from being the only thing on the screen. A book with a moving twitter feed in the margin would be a disaster. But many are willingly doing just that. Additional displays often lead to continuously displaying potential distractions. Youāre much more likely to keep working if your email, social media, and so on arenāt visible.
As a developer, I write code on a daily basis. So I often read docs. But I rarely need the docs visible at the same time Iām writing code. I read the relevant doc, then code. My workflow is modal.
But after a few days, I was surprised to find my opinion soured. It was far too wide to maximize my windows, so I found myself spending too much time fiddling with windows. āWhat should I put on the left today?ā āWhatās important enough to be in the middle now?ā
Sure, the screen was wide enough to display multiple windows side-by-side, but it was so wide that the edges felt uncomfortably distant. So, I found myself constantly moving my work to the center of screen, thus, defeating the whole purpose of a huge display! Jeff Atwood discussed this issue long ago in āā. His solution? Use software to make moving and resizing windows easier. My solution? Just use a single reasonably-sized monitor.
Even with handy window management software, multiple monitors present a problem: If I have two monitors, the content isnāt directly in front of me. I have to turn my head either right or left (particularly annoying when walking on a treadmill desk, as I often doāāāsee pic below). I could place one monitor directly in front of me, but then the second monitor is even farther to the sideāāāmaking it clearly a second-class citizen. This again leads to moving whatever Iām working on to the middle screen. As Barry Schwartz explores in āā, decision fatigue is a real problem. Sometimes, more is less.
āChoice has made us not freer but more paralyzed, not happier but more dissatisfied.āWith a single screen, I eliminate decisions. I donāt waste time deciding where to drag windows or fiddling with where to place a given window. I maximize the app Iām working with to block out all other distractionsā¦and get to work.
Both Mac and Windows support virtual desktops now. On my Mac, I can 3 finger swipe to quickly switch between multiple virtual desktops. This takes less than a second and it doesnāt require me to turn my head and refocus my eyes on content in a different spot. But I donāt waste cycles on this arrangement either. The far left virtual desktop is always my browser, the one to the right is my editor. So I treat virtual desktops like physical screens that reliably present the same content.
The three boxes at the top represent three virtual desktops. A three finger swipe instantly switches between themāāāin no more time than it would take to turn my head and look at a separateĀ monitor. As a side note, if youāre on a Mac, be sure to disable auto rearrange:
I often work remote in coffee houses, libraries, public parks, outside on the deck, and on planes. I take my 15" MacBook Pro (review) everywhere. Since I work on a single screen at home, my workflow isnāt impacted when Iām away from my desk. I just keep using virtual desktops to get things done.
Last week I enjoyed working from the beach without any impact to my normal workflow. When I had multiple monitors, I had to rearrange my windows every time I undocked my machine. Now thereās no friction when I undock. All windows remain maximized, and they remain in the same position on my virtual desktops. Itās like having an unlimited set of virtual monitors, that are always in the same position, wherever I work.
I prefer using a single 24" 4K. Why 24"? Because if you want to get actual work done, bigger isnāt necessarily better. 24" is large enough to display a single application full-screen. And itās large enough to display two apps side-by-side in the rare instances that I truly need to see two things simultaneously (I use on Mac and simply hit Win+arrow on Windows). However, 24" is small enough that you can maximize all applications without needing to move your head or eyes much to see the screen edges. Remember, maximize all the things. Maximized = focused.
Hereās my current set up:Dell 2415q on Ergotron Monitor Arm. Walking on a treadmill keeps me focused, fit, and awake during the day. I no longer struggle with comfy-chair-induced drowsiness. The treadmill rolls out of the way when Iām tired and ready toĀ sit. Why 4K? High DPI reduces fatigue. Text is much crisper. And prices are finally reasonable, so if you donāt own a high DPI display yet, buy one. And a 24" 4K has more dots per inch than larger 4K screens, so itās crisper. Any MacBook Pro built in the last few years can push a 4K display at 60hz over DisplayPort. Many recent Windows laptops can do so as well. So why do so many workers demand multiple monitors? I believe itās a case of .
Too much monitor becomes a distraction. So when it comes to monitors, I embrace these maxims:Too much of anything becomes its oppositeĀ .āāāTimĀ Ferriss